Light W C, Reisman R E, Rosario N A, Arbesman C E
Clin Allergy. 1976 May;6(3):293-300. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2222.1976.tb01909.x.
The allergenic properties of bee venom and whole bee body extract were compared by in vivo and in vitro tests. The majority of patients with known bee sting sensitivity had positive intracutaneous skin test reactions with bee venom and had bee venom specific IgE in their sera. Of seventeen patients with ppsitive bee venom skin tests, nine had positive tests with whole bee body extract. Of thirty sera containing elevated levels of bee venom specific IgE obtained from untreated patients, fourteen sera contained whole body specific IgE but in much lower titres. In RAST inhibition experiments using both bee venom and whole bee body extract as coupling antigens, bee venom was a more potent inhibiting antigen than whole body extract. From these experiments we conclude that bee venom is a more potent allergen than whole bee body extract.
通过体内和体外试验比较了蜂毒和全蜂提取物的致敏特性。大多数已知对蜂蜇敏感的患者对蜂毒的皮内皮肤试验反应呈阳性,且血清中有蜂毒特异性IgE。在17名蜂毒皮肤试验呈阳性的患者中,9名对全蜂提取物的试验呈阳性。从未经治疗的患者中获得的30份含有高水平蜂毒特异性IgE的血清中,14份血清含有全身体特异性IgE,但效价低得多。在使用蜂毒和全蜂提取物作为偶联抗原的RAST抑制试验中,蜂毒比全身体提取物是更有效的抑制抗原。从这些实验中我们得出结论,蜂毒比全蜂提取物是更强效的变应原。