Julkunen I
J Med Virol. 1984;14(2):177-87. doi: 10.1002/jmv.1890140212.
Enzyme immunoassay (EIA) for parainfluenza virus type 1, 2, and 3 antibodies was compared with the complement fixation test (CF) as a diagnostic method in 180 patients with respiratory symptoms. The CF test detected rises in parainfluenza virus antibodies in 30 cases, whereas EIA detected 47 rises. Patients with antibody rises in parainfluenza or mumps virus antibodies were studied for cross-reactions by CF, hemagglutination inhibition (HAI), and EIA using purified viral envelope glycoprotein and nucleocapsid preparations. All methods showed marked cross-reactivity between parainfluenza virus type 1 and 3 antibodies. Mumps virus infection often raised heterologous antibodies even against purified viral antigens. Rabbit antisera produced against viral envelope glycoproteins showed heterologous antibody responses between parainfluenza 1 and 3 antibodies and between parainfluenza 1 and mumps antibodies by HAI, EIA, and immunoprecipitation. The cross-reactive antibodies were usually directed against both of the envelope glycoproteins, HN and F proteins, of the viruses.
在180例有呼吸道症状的患者中,将1、2和3型副流感病毒抗体的酶免疫测定(EIA)与补体结合试验(CF)作为诊断方法进行了比较。CF试验在30例中检测到副流感病毒抗体升高,而EIA检测到47例升高。对副流感或腮腺炎病毒抗体升高的患者,使用纯化的病毒包膜糖蛋白和核衣壳制剂,通过CF、血凝抑制(HAI)和EIA研究交叉反应。所有方法均显示1型和3型副流感病毒抗体之间有明显的交叉反应。腮腺炎病毒感染常产生针对纯化病毒抗原的异源抗体。针对病毒包膜糖蛋白产生的兔抗血清通过HAI、EIA和免疫沉淀显示,在1型和3型副流感病毒抗体之间以及1型副流感病毒和腮腺炎抗体之间存在异源抗体反应。交叉反应抗体通常针对病毒的两种包膜糖蛋白HN和F蛋白。