Suppr超能文献

用于检测 IgM 类抗甲型肝炎病毒抗体(抗 - Hav)的固相检测系统的比较。

Comparison of solid phase test systems for demonstrating antibodies against hepatitis A virus (anti-Hav) of the IgM-class.

作者信息

Roggendorf M, Frösner G G, Deinhardt F, Scheid R

出版信息

J Med Virol. 1980;5(1):47-62. doi: 10.1002/jmv.1890050107.

Abstract

Three methods were compared for determining anti-HAV of the IgM class. In the first method flat-bottomed microtiter plates coated consecutively with anti-HAV of the IgG class and HAAg were incubated with patient serum and, after washing, peroxidase conjugated anti-mu was added. After subsequent incubation with substrate the enzymatic reaction was stopped and the optical density was measured. In the second method the solid phase was coated first with antibodies to IgM and after incubation with patient serum and subsequent incubations with HAAg and 125I anti-HAV of the IgG class radioactivity was counted. These two methods were compared with reorienting sucrose gradient ultracentrifugation, an established method for demonstrating specific IgM antibodies. The persistence of IgM anti-HAV in 103 sera drawn at different times after onset of jaundice was evaluated. Sera drawn up to 30 days after onset of hepatitis A were IgM anti-HAV positive with both of the first two methods. Forty-one to 90 days after onset of illness IgM anti-HAV could be demonstrated with the first method in 47% of the patients, in 94% with the second method, and in 82% with gradient centrifugation. The second method was most sensitive and could be adjusted so that at a serum dilution of 1:10(4) anti-HAV IgM was detected only up to six months after infection. In contrast to the first method, nonspecific reactions caused by rheumatoid factor were not detected with the second method. During a one-year period about 15,000 sera of patients with clinical diagnoses of acute hepatitis were tested; the positive results correlated well with the clinical data, and there was no indication of nonspecific positive results.

摘要

比较了三种测定IgM类抗甲型肝炎病毒(anti-HAV)的方法。在第一种方法中,将依次包被有IgG类抗甲型肝炎病毒和甲型肝炎抗原(HAAg)的平底微量滴定板与患者血清一起孵育,洗涤后,加入过氧化物酶标记的抗μ链抗体。随后与底物孵育后,终止酶促反应并测量光密度。在第二种方法中,固相首先包被抗IgM抗体,与患者血清孵育后,再依次与甲型肝炎抗原和IgG类125I抗甲型肝炎病毒孵育,然后计数放射性。将这两种方法与蔗糖密度梯度超速离心法进行比较,蔗糖密度梯度超速离心法是一种已确立的用于检测特异性IgM抗体的方法。评估了在黄疸发作后不同时间采集的103份血清中IgM抗甲型肝炎病毒的持续存在情况。甲型肝炎发病后30天内采集的血清,前两种方法检测IgM抗甲型肝炎病毒均为阳性。发病后41至90天,第一种方法在47%的患者中可检测到IgM抗甲型肝炎病毒,第二种方法为94%,梯度离心法为82%。第二种方法最敏感,并且可以进行调整,使得在血清稀释度为1:10(4)时,仅在感染后六个月内检测到抗甲型肝炎病毒IgM。与第一种方法不同,第二种方法未检测到类风湿因子引起的非特异性反应。在一年的时间里,对约150,000例临床诊断为急性肝炎的患者血清进行了检测;阳性结果与临床数据相关性良好,未显示有非特异性阳性结果。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验