Rubenstein A S, Miller M F
J Clin Microbiol. 1982 May;15(5):938-44. doi: 10.1128/jcm.15.5.938-944.1982.
The sensitivity and specificity of an enzyme immunoassay (Rotazyme), an ongrid immunoelectron microscopy procedure, and conventional negative stain electron microscopic techniques were compared. By using partially purified human rotavirus and simian rotavirus (SA-11) of known particle concentration, the enzyme immunoassay was essentially equivalent to the immunoelectron microscopic procedure and significantly more sensitive than conventional electron microscopic techniques. The level of sensitivity was approximately 10(6) particles per ml for simian rotavirus SA-11 and 10(7) particles per ml for human rotavirus. In an evaluation of 455 clinical samples by these techniques, a sensitivity of 98% and specificity of 92% were demonstrated. Samples negative by the immunoelectron microscopic procedure and positive by enzyme immunoassay could be confirmed by a blocking assay.
对酶免疫测定法(Rotazyme)、网格免疫电子显微镜法及传统负染电子显微镜技术的敏感性和特异性进行了比较。通过使用已知颗粒浓度的部分纯化人轮状病毒和猿猴轮状病毒(SA - 11),酶免疫测定法与免疫电子显微镜法基本等效,且显著比传统电子显微镜技术更敏感。猿猴轮状病毒SA - 11的敏感水平约为每毫升10(6)个颗粒,人轮状病毒为每毫升10(7)个颗粒。通过这些技术对455份临床样本进行评估,显示敏感性为98%,特异性为92%。免疫电子显微镜法检测为阴性而酶免疫测定法检测为阳性的样本可通过阻断试验得到证实。