Phillpotts R J, Scott G M, Higgins P G, Wallace J, Tyrrell D A, Gauci C L
Antiviral Res. 1983 Aug;3(2):121-36. doi: 10.1016/0166-3542(83)90034-7.
Before the prophylactic effect of human interferon alpha 2 (HuIFN-alpha 2) can be tested against naturally acquired rhinovirus infection in a large-scale field trial, it is desirable to show that self-administration of the drug is practical, and to determine the smallest well-tolerated dose likely to produce a worthwhile effect. Here we report that self-administered intranasal interferon can be effective, and show how prophylaxis against rhinovirus infection is affected by both the quantity of interferon, and the interval between a dose and virus challenge. Finally, the medication regimen suggested for use in field trials (3.85 MU 3 times/day) was tested in a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in volunteers. Although virus challenge was at a time when those being treated with interferon would be most susceptible, a substantial protective effect was still demonstrated.
在对人干扰素α2(HuIFN-α2)针对自然获得的鼻病毒感染的预防效果进行大规模现场试验之前,有必要证明该药物的自我给药是可行的,并确定可能产生有效效果的最小耐受剂量。在此我们报告,自我给药的鼻内干扰素可能有效,并展示了预防鼻病毒感染如何受到干扰素数量以及给药剂量与病毒攻击之间间隔的影响。最后,在志愿者中进行了一项双盲、安慰剂对照试验,对建议用于现场试验的给药方案(3.85百万单位,每日3次)进行了测试。尽管病毒攻击是在接受干扰素治疗的人最易感染的时候进行的,但仍显示出显著的保护作用。