Spagnoli A, Tognoni G
Drugs. 1983 Jul;26(1):44-69. doi: 10.2165/00003495-198326010-00003.
While their importance in the market-place is steadily increasing in developed (mainly continental Europe) and even in developing countries, compounds included in the broad category of 'cerebroactive' drugs hardly rate a mention in reference pharmacology and therapeutics textbooks. It is an undeniable fact, however, that the principal users or targets of this drug class, mainly elderly people, represent an increasingly worrying problem, with their often puzzling cohort of ill-definable and even less predictable neurological and mental symptoms. The combination of the above factors cannot but produce a rather confused situation, in which the pressure to treat and the adherence to scientifically rigorous assessment are likely to prevail alternately, on a purely casual basis. This review aims to provide sound methodological guidelines for assessment of 'cerebroactive' drugs in a not always easily accessible literature. It covers firstly the general problems of stroke, dementia and 'common symptoms' of the elderly, and then looks in detail at those compounds which have to date attracted most attention (ergot derivatives, cinnarizine, flunarizine, vincamine, eburnamonine, naftidrofuryl, oxpentifylline, piracetam and citicoline), as well as those which are currently considered investigational (choline and lecithin). The pharmacology and available clinical studies of each drug are examined. No therapeutic indication can be derived from the available evidence, as the few positive results do not go beyond random improvement of symptoms. More fundamentally, the lines of research which need to be pursued most intensively relate to better preliminary definition of diagnostic and prognostic criteria and, with the establishment of adequate testing tools for the assessment of behaviour and neuropsychological performance, those basal conditions which are modified 'naturally' or by drugs.
在发达国家(主要是欧洲大陆)甚至发展中国家,“脑活性”药物在市场上的重要性正稳步上升,但在药理学和治疗学的参考教科书中,这类药物几乎未被提及。然而,不可否认的事实是,这类药物的主要使用者或目标人群主要是老年人,这一群体正日益成为令人担忧的问题,他们常常伴有难以明确界定甚至更难预测的神经和精神症状。上述因素的综合作用必然导致一种相当混乱的局面,在这种局面下,治疗压力和坚持科学严谨评估可能会在纯粹偶然的基础上交替占据主导。本综述旨在为在并非总是容易获取的文献中评估“脑活性”药物提供合理的方法指南。它首先涵盖中风、痴呆和老年人“常见症状”的一般问题,然后详细探讨那些迄今为止最受关注的化合物(麦角衍生物、桂利嗪、氟桂利嗪、长春胺、长春痛定、奈呋胺酯、己酮可可碱、吡拉西坦和胞磷胆碱),以及目前被视为处于研究阶段的化合物(胆碱和卵磷脂)。对每种药物的药理学和现有临床研究进行了审查。由于少数阳性结果不过是症状的随机改善,因此无法从现有证据中得出任何治疗指征。更根本的是,最需要深入研究的方向涉及更好地初步界定诊断和预后标准,以及随着用于评估行为和神经心理表现的适当测试工具的建立,那些“自然”或通过药物改变的基础状况。