Suppr超能文献

深度不确定烧伤的早期切除与植皮术对比非手术治疗:一项随机前瞻性研究

Early excision and grafting vs. nonoperative treatment of burns of indeterminant depth: a randomized prospective study.

作者信息

Engrav L H, Heimbach D M, Reus J L, Harnar T J, Marvin J A

出版信息

J Trauma. 1983 Nov;23(11):1001-4. doi: 10.1097/00005373-198311000-00007.

Abstract

Compared to nonoperative treatment with silver sulfadiazine cream, early excision and grafting of 22 patients with indeterminant burns of less than 20% TBSA resulted in an average shorter hospitalization, lower cost, and less time away from work than 25 patients treated nonoperatively. While early excision and grafting resulted in increased use of blood products and operating room facilities, this did not result in increased patient morbidity. Long-term followup demonstrated no difference in need for reconstruction, incidence of blisters, incidence of loss of motion, or contour irregularities. Those patients treated nonoperatively required more late grafts for closure and demonstrated more hypertrophic scarring. Those treated by early excision demonstrated more mesh graft irregularity. We conclude that in otherwise healthy patients with dermal burns of indeterminant depth less than 20% total body surface area, early excision and grafting is the preferred form of treatment.

摘要

与使用磺胺嘧啶银乳膏的非手术治疗相比,22例烧伤面积小于20%总体表面积的不确定深度烧伤患者早期切除并植皮,与25例接受非手术治疗的患者相比,平均住院时间更短、费用更低、误工时间更少。虽然早期切除并植皮导致血液制品和手术室设施的使用增加,但这并未导致患者发病率增加。长期随访表明,在重建需求、水泡发生率、活动丧失发生率或外形不规则方面没有差异。那些接受非手术治疗的患者需要更多的晚期植皮来封闭创面,并且表现出更多的肥厚性瘢痕。早期切除治疗的患者表现出更多的网状植皮不规则。我们得出结论,对于其他方面健康、烧伤面积小于20%总体表面积的不确定深度真皮烧伤患者,早期切除并植皮是首选的治疗方式。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验