Suppr超能文献

五种白细胞标记技术:一项体外对比研究。

Five leucocyte labelling techniques: a comparative in-vitro study.

作者信息

Colas-Linhart N, Barbu M, Gougerot M A, Bok B

出版信息

Br J Haematol. 1983 Jan;53(1):31-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.1983.tb01983.x.

Abstract

During the past years, several authors have used labelled leucocytes to detect inflammatory foci. However, before routine use in man. It is necessary to control the viability of labelled cells. Five leucocyte labelling techniques (111In-oxine, 111In-oxine without extraction, 99mTc oxine, pyrophosphate 99mTc, 51Cr) were compared using the same separation methods, conservation medium, viability assays and migration studies. Electron microscopic studies allowed the assessment of cellular damage induced by the labelling techniques as well as the calculation of the percentage of cells disrupted during preparation. Results obtained in vitro using 111In-oxine were not satisfactory and in fact appeared contradictory to those published by the authors using this technique in vivo. Even the best method, pyrophosphate 99mTc labelling, was not completely atoxic, but the functional behaviour of the leucocytes did not seem affected. While in vitro studies offer much information concerning labelled cells, they cannot predict the in vivo behaviour of these cells.

摘要

在过去几年中,有几位作者使用标记白细胞来检测炎症病灶。然而,在用于人体的常规应用之前,有必要控制标记细胞的活力。使用相同的分离方法、保存培养基、活力测定和迁移研究,对五种白细胞标记技术(铟-111 奥辛、未提取的铟-111 奥辛、锝-99m 奥辛、焦磷酸盐锝-99m、铬-51)进行了比较。电子显微镜研究可以评估标记技术引起的细胞损伤,以及计算制备过程中受损细胞的百分比。使用铟-111 奥辛在体外获得的结果并不令人满意,实际上与作者在体内使用该技术发表的结果相矛盾。即使是最好的方法,焦磷酸盐锝-99m 标记,也并非完全无毒,但白细胞的功能行为似乎未受影响。虽然体外研究提供了许多关于标记细胞的信息,但它们无法预测这些细胞在体内的行为。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验