• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

智障成年人在四种对话场景中的交际表现。

Communicative performance of mentally retarded adults in four conversational settings.

作者信息

Bedrosian J L, Prutting C A

出版信息

J Speech Hear Res. 1978 Mar;21(1):79-95. doi: 10.1044/jshr.2101.79.

DOI:10.1044/jshr.2101.79
PMID:642491
Abstract

A sociolinguistic analysis of the communicative performances and social interactions of four mentally retarded adults was conducted. Role relationships were examined along dimensions of dominance-submission and control in various conversational settings. Audiotape recordings were made of each adult's conversation while engaged in discourse with his speech-language pathologist, peers, parents, and with a normal young child. Relational communication coding schemes involving the analysis of questions and subsequent responses were applied to the data. Results indicated that the retarded adults, though not always able to hold a dominant position in a conversation, were capable of expressing the same types of control as normal adults. The types of control expressed by each subject varied as a function of the conversational setting. Furthermore, differences existed in the types and frequencies of control expressed across subjects. These findings suggest that a sociolinguistic approach provides important information regarding the mentally retarded adult's communicative performance.

摘要

对四名成年智障人士的交际表现和社会互动进行了社会语言学分析。在各种对话场景中,从主导-服从和控制维度对角色关系进行了考察。对每位成年人在与言语病理学家、同龄人、父母以及一名正常幼儿交谈时的对话进行了录音。将涉及问题分析和后续回答的关系性沟通编码方案应用于这些数据。结果表明,智障成年人虽然并非总能在对话中占据主导地位,但能够表现出与正常成年人相同类型的控制。每个受试者所表现出的控制类型因对话场景而异。此外,不同受试者在控制类型和频率上也存在差异。这些发现表明,社会语言学方法为了解成年智障人士的交际表现提供了重要信息。

相似文献

1
Communicative performance of mentally retarded adults in four conversational settings.智障成年人在四种对话场景中的交际表现。
J Speech Hear Res. 1978 Mar;21(1):79-95. doi: 10.1044/jshr.2101.79.
2
Elicited and spontaneous communicative functions and stability of conversational measures with children who have pragmatic language impairments.患有语用语言障碍儿童的诱发和自发交际功能以及会话测量的稳定性。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2005 Jul-Sep;40(3):333-47. doi: 10.1080/13682820400027768.
3
Mentally retarded adolescents: evaluation of communication strategies in different settings.智力发育迟缓青少年:不同环境下沟通策略的评估
Int J Rehabil Res. 1988;11(4):369-78. doi: 10.1097/00004356-198812000-00006.
4
The effect of communicative demands on request-making in the moderately and severely mentally retarded.沟通要求对中度及重度智力迟钝者提出请求行为的影响。
Appl Res Ment Retard. 1983;4(1):13-27. doi: 10.1016/s0270-3092(83)80015-0.
5
Characterizing verbal interaction among moderately mentally retarded peers: some methodological issues.描述中度智力迟钝同龄人之间的言语互动:一些方法学问题。
Appl Res Ment Retard. 1980;1(3-4):209-25. doi: 10.1016/0270-3092(80)90005-3.
6
Getting there: directions given by mildly retarded and nonretarded adults.到达那里:轻度智障和非智障成年人给出的指示。
Monogr Am Assoc Ment Defic (1982). 1984(6):27-41.
7
Group conversational-skills training and social validation with mentally retarded adults.针对成年智障者的小组对话技能训练与社会验证。
Appl Res Ment Retard. 1986;7(4):443-58. doi: 10.1016/s0270-3092(86)80017-0.
8
The development of persuasive strategies by mentally retarded children.智障儿童说服策略的发展。
Appl Res Ment Retard. 1985;6(4):437-47. doi: 10.1016/0270-3092(85)90019-0.
9
Verbal interaction patterns of depressed and non-depressed institutionalized mentally retarded adults.抑郁和非抑郁的机构化智障成年人的言语互动模式。
Appl Res Ment Retard. 1982;3(1):1-12. doi: 10.1016/0270-3092(82)90054-6.
10
Conversational topics of staff members and institutionalized individuals with mental retardation.工作人员与机构收容的智障人士的谈话主题。
Ment Retard. 1993 Jun;31(3):148-53.

引用本文的文献

1
Signaling noncomprehension of language: a comparison of fragile X syndrome and Down syndrome.语言信号理解障碍:脆性X综合征与唐氏综合征的比较
Am J Ment Retard. 2008 May;113(3):214-30. doi: 10.1352/0895-8017(2008)113[214:SNOLAC]2.0.CO;2.
2
Social and pragmatic deficits in autism: cognitive or affective?自闭症中的社交和语用缺陷:认知还是情感方面的?
J Autism Dev Disord. 1988 Sep;18(3):379-402. doi: 10.1007/BF02212194.