Welch S J, Pear J J
J Appl Behav Anal. 1980 Winter;13(4):629-43. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1980.13-629.
Picture-cards, photographs, and real objects were compared as training stimuli in order to determine which best facilitated the generalization of naming responses learned in a special training room to real objects in the natural environments of four retarded children. The amount of transfer of naming behavior between the three stimulus modes and the average amount of training time required per stimulus mode were also assessed. Three of the four children displayed considerably more generalization to the real objects in the natural environment when they were trained with real objects. The fourth child displayed substantial generalization regardless of the training stimulus mode. No particular training stimulus mode clearly facilitated the transfer of naming responses to other modes or greatly reduced training time. The results of two supplementary procedures conducted with one child showed that: (1) training in several environments facilitated generalization to real objects in the natural environment when real objects were used as training stimuli but not when picture-cards were used, and (2) transfer from picture-cards to real objects was facilitated by training other picture-cards and the real objects portrayed by them at the same time.
研究人员比较了图片卡片、照片和真实物体作为训练刺激物的效果,目的是确定哪种刺激物最能促进在特殊训练室中学习的命名反应向四名智障儿童自然环境中的真实物体进行泛化。同时还评估了三种刺激模式之间命名行为的迁移量以及每种刺激模式所需的平均训练时间。四个孩子中有三个在使用真实物体进行训练时,对自然环境中的真实物体表现出了明显更多的泛化。第四个孩子无论训练刺激模式如何,都表现出了显著的泛化。没有一种特定的训练刺激模式能明显促进命名反应向其他模式的迁移,也没有显著减少训练时间。对一名儿童进行的两个补充程序的结果表明:(1)当使用真实物体作为训练刺激物时,在多个环境中进行训练有助于向自然环境中的真实物体进行泛化,但使用图片卡片时则不然;(2)同时训练其他图片卡片及其所描绘的真实物体,有助于从图片卡片向真实物体的迁移。