Akhutina T V, Tsvetkova L S
Brain Cogn. 1983 Apr;2(2):129-34. doi: 10.1016/0278-2626(83)90003-9.
Appreciation is expressed for the work of Golden's group in the selection of Luria's tests, the standardization of their administration, the collection of norms, and the evaluation of the reliability and validity of the Luria-Nebraska test battery. However, questions are raised concerning the ability of the test to efficiently handle topical diagnosis and to construct rehabilitation programs. Concern is expressed over the possible vulgarization of Luria's doctrine of functional systems and the loss of predictive power in Luria's tests through neglect of qualitative information and methodology. Suggestions are made as to how Luria's qualitative methodology might be incorporated in a standardized version of a neuropsychological examination.
感谢戈尔登团队在选择鲁利亚测试、规范测试实施、收集常模以及评估鲁利亚 - 内布拉斯加测试组合的信度和效度方面所做的工作。然而，对于该测试有效进行局部诊断和构建康复计划的能力提出了疑问。有人担心鲁利亚功能系统学说可能会被庸俗化，以及由于忽视定性信息和方法，鲁利亚测试的预测能力会丧失。文中就如何将鲁利亚的定性方法纳入神经心理学检查的标准化版本提出了建议。
