Golden C J, Purisch A, Sweet J, Graber B, Osmon D, Hammeke T
Int J Neurosci. 1980;11(3):227-36. doi: 10.3109/00207458009147588.
In recent years, Golden and his associates have devised and presented a standardized version of Luria's neuropsychological examination. One of the main advantages of this battery over Luria's more qualitative approach is the possibility of examining a number of the theoretical statements made by Luria concerning the relationship of basic psychological skills which make up the tests in each of ten major areas of neuropsychological function. The present paper is the second in a series attempting to examine some of the interrelationships among items on the standardized battery and compare these to Luria's theoretical structures. To do this, the Luria-Nebraska Neuropsychological Battery was administered to a mixed neurological, psychiatric and normal population of 272 individuals. From the results of these tests, principle axis factor analyses (with communalities on the diagonal) were done on four scales (Visual, Expressive, Receptive, Reading) and obliquely rotated to the simplest solution. The resulting factors were found generally to conform to the factors predicted by Luria's theory. The interpretation of each factor found is discussed, as well as its implication.
近年来，戈尔登及其同事设计并提出了卢里亚神经心理学测验的标准化版本。相较于卢里亚更具定性的方法，该测验组合的一个主要优势在于，有可能对卢里亚提出的一些理论观点进行检验，这些观点涉及构成神经心理功能十个主要领域中每个领域测验的基本心理技能之间的关系。本文是系列文章中的第二篇，试图探究标准化测验组合中各项目之间的一些相互关系，并将其与卢里亚的理论结构进行比较。为此，对272名神经科、精神科患者及正常人的混合样本施测了卢里亚 - 内布拉斯加神经心理测验组合。根据这些测试结果，对四个分量表（视觉、表达、接受、阅读）进行了主成分因子分析（对角线元素为共同度），并进行斜交旋转以得到最简单的解。结果发现，所得因子总体上符合卢里亚理论所预测的因子。文章讨论了所发现的每个因子的解释及其意义。
