• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

1800多名耳鸣门诊患者的耳鸣特征及相关观察结果

Characteristics of tinnitus and related observations in over 1800 tinnitus clinic patients.

作者信息

Meikle M, Taylor-Walsh E

出版信息

J Laryngol Otol Suppl. 1984;9:17-21. doi: 10.1017/s1755146300090053.

DOI:10.1017/s1755146300090053
PMID:6596358
Abstract

This report has provided a brief survey of the Tinnitus Clinic population as it appeared near the end of 1981, when 1806 patients had been seen. That number is probably sufficient to provide satisfactory statistical reliability for the observations cited here. It should be mentioned that the Tinnitus Clinic has continued to accumulate cases, at the approximate rate of 30 per month, and at this writing the total number of patients seen to date is over 2300. The data obtained from the first 1806 patients were collected under conditions that were not as homogeneous as those prevailing now, in that standardized testing equipment was not available until January 1979, and testing techniques were continuing to be revised even after that time. In addition a major revision of the patient questionnaires was undertaken late in 1981, with the result that much more detailed information is being obtained than was formerly possible using the old questionnaire format. Thus, we can anticipate that the next such survey of the Tinnitus Clinic population will offer considerably expanded and more detailed types of observations than those presented here.

摘要

本报告简要概述了耳鸣诊所截至1981年底的患者情况,当时已诊治1806名患者。这个数字或许足以使此处引用的观察结果具有令人满意的统计可靠性。应当提及的是,耳鸣诊所仍在继续积累病例,大约每月30例,撰写本文时,迄今诊治的患者总数已超过2300例。从前1806名患者那里获得的数据是在不如现在普遍的条件下收集的,因为直到1979年1月才有标准化检测设备,而且即便在那之后检测技术仍在不断修订。此外,1981年末对患者问卷进行了重大修订,结果是使用旧问卷格式已无法获得比以前详细得多的信息。因此,我们可以预期,下次对耳鸣诊所患者群体进行此类调查时,将能提供比本文所呈现的更为广泛和详细的观察结果类型。

相似文献

1
Characteristics of tinnitus and related observations in over 1800 tinnitus clinic patients.1800多名耳鸣门诊患者的耳鸣特征及相关观察结果
J Laryngol Otol Suppl. 1984;9:17-21. doi: 10.1017/s1755146300090053.
2
The short form 36 (SF36) in a specialist tinnitus clinic.
Int J Audiol. 2002 Jun;41(4):216-20. doi: 10.3109/14992020209078334.
3
Survey of the perceived benefits and shortcomings of a specialist tinnitus clinic.对一家专科耳鸣诊所的感知益处与缺点的调查。
Audiology. 2000 Nov-Dec;39(6):333-9.
4
Epidemiology of tinnitus, Medical Research Council's Institute of Hearing Research.耳鸣的流行病学,医学研究委员会听力研究所
Ciba Found Symp. 1981;85:16-34.
5
Tinnitus in the general population with a focus on noise and stress: a public health study.一般人群中的耳鸣:关注噪声和压力:一项公共卫生研究。
Ear Hear. 2011 Nov-Dec;32(6):787-9. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31822229bd.
6
Occupational exposure to noise and the attributable burden of hearing difficulties in Great Britain.英国的职业性噪声暴露与听力困难的归因负担
Occup Environ Med. 2002 Sep;59(9):634-9. doi: 10.1136/oem.59.9.634.
7
Chronic tinnitus resulting from head or neck injuries.由头部或颈部损伤引起的慢性耳鸣。
Laryngoscope. 2003 May;113(5):821-7. doi: 10.1097/00005537-200305000-00010.
8
Skarzynski Tinnitus Scale: validation of a brief and robust tool for assessing tinnitus in a clinical population.斯卡尔津斯基耳鸣量表:用于评估临床人群耳鸣的一种简短而稳健的工具的验证。
Eur J Med Res. 2018 Nov 1;23(1):54. doi: 10.1186/s40001-018-0347-4.
9
Tinnitus and suicide.耳鸣与自杀
Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci. 1994 Feb;19(1):50-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2273.1994.tb01147.x.
10
The psychometric properties of the Tinnitus Handicap Questionnaire in a Dutch-speaking population.耳鸣残疾问卷在荷兰语人群中的心理测量特性。
Clin Otolaryngol. 2011 Feb;36(1):9-16. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-4486.2010.02256.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Tinnitus Stepped-Care: A Model for Standardizing Clinical Services for Tinnitus.耳鸣阶梯式护理:一种规范耳鸣临床服务的模式。
Semin Hear. 2025 Mar 7;45(3-04):255-275. doi: 10.1055/s-0045-1804509. eCollection 2024 Aug.
2
Consensus Statements on Tinnitus Assessment and Treatment Outcome Evaluation: A Delphi Study by the Korean Tinnitus Study Group.耳鸣评估与治疗结果评估的共识声明:韩国耳鸣研究小组的德尔菲研究
J Korean Med Sci. 2025 Feb 24;40(7):e93. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2025.40.e93.
3
AUDISTIM Day/Night Alleviates Tinnitus-Related Handicap in Patients with Chronic Tinnitus: A Double-Blind Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial.
AUDISTIM日夜疗法减轻慢性耳鸣患者与耳鸣相关的障碍:一项双盲随机安慰剂对照试验
Audiol Res. 2024 Apr 10;14(2):359-371. doi: 10.3390/audiolres14020031.
4
Treatment Tone Spacing and Acute Effects of Acoustic Coordinated Reset Stimulation in Tinnitus Patients.耳鸣患者中听觉协调重置刺激的治疗音调间隔及急性效应
Front Netw Physiol. 2021 Oct 6;1:734344. doi: 10.3389/fnetp.2021.734344. eCollection 2021.
5
Effectiveness and cost effectiveness of digital hearing aids in patients with tinnitus and hearing loss: a randomised feasibility trial (THE HUSH Trial).数字助听器对耳鸣和听力损失患者的有效性及成本效益:一项随机可行性试验(安静试验)
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2022 Nov 3;8(1):235. doi: 10.1186/s40814-022-01188-9.
6
Effect of Ipsilateral, Contralateral or Bilateral Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Patients with Lateralized Tinnitus: A Placebo-Controlled Randomized Study.同侧、对侧或双侧重复经颅磁刺激对单侧耳鸣患者的影响:一项安慰剂对照随机研究。
Brain Sci. 2022 Jun 2;12(6):733. doi: 10.3390/brainsci12060733.
7
Distortion Product Otoacoustic Emissions (DPOAEs) In Tinnitus Patients.耳鸣患者的畸变产物耳声发射(DPOAE)
Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2021 Mar 29;26(1):e046-e057. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1722248. eCollection 2022 Jan.
8
Objective Recognition of Tinnitus Location Using Electroencephalography Connectivity Features.利用脑电图连接特征客观识别耳鸣位置
Front Neurosci. 2022 Jan 4;15:784721. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2021.784721. eCollection 2021.
9
The effect of caffeine on tinnitus: Randomized triple-blind placebo-controlled clinical trial.咖啡因对耳鸣的影响:随机、三盲、安慰剂对照的临床试验。
PLoS One. 2021 Sep 20;16(9):e0256275. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0256275. eCollection 2021.
10
Momentary Analysis of Tinnitus: Considering the Patient.耳鸣的瞬间分析:从患者角度考虑。
Curr Top Behav Neurosci. 2021;51:383-401. doi: 10.1007/7854_2020_176.