Musiek F E
Ear Hear. 1983 Nov-Dec;4(6):318-23. doi: 10.1097/00003446-198311000-00010.
Thirty adult subjects with intracranial lesions (12 brain stem and 18 hemispheric) were tested using Competing Sentences, Staggered Spondaic Words, and Dichotic Digits. In comparing these dichotic tests for their ability to detect abnormal performance for individual subjects, the Digit test appeared most sensitive, followed by the Staggered Spondaic Word test and Competing Sentences. This trend seemed to prevail for subjects with hemispheric and brain stem lesions. All three tests demonstrated greater ipsilateral ear deficits for subjects with brain stem lesions. However, for subjects with hemispheric lesions all tests showed generally poorer scores for the ear contralateral to the lesion. These results, as well as other types of analyses for comparing the three dichotic tests in this study, are discussed.
使用竞争句子、交错扬扬格词和双耳数字测试对30名患有颅内病变的成年人（12名脑干病变患者和18名半球病变患者）进行了测试。在比较这些双耳测试检测个体受试者异常表现的能力时，数字测试似乎最敏感，其次是交错扬扬格词测试和竞争句子测试。这种趋势似乎在患有半球病变和脑干病变的受试者中都普遍存在。对于患有脑干病变的受试者，所有三项测试都显示出更大的同侧耳缺陷。然而，对于患有半球病变的受试者，所有测试都显示病变对侧耳朵的分数普遍较差。本文讨论了这些结果以及本研究中比较这三项双耳测试的其他类型分析。
