Block J H
Child Dev. 1983 Dec;54(6):1335-54.
The sex-differentiated socialization emphases of parents and other representatives of societal institutions are considered as they influence the personality development and behavioral orientations of males and females. Specifically, sex-differentiated socialization emphases, "shaping" behaviors, and teaching styles are evaluated with regard to the nature of the "meta-messages" conveyed to boys and girls during their early, formative years. These messages are assumed to differentially influence the self-concepts evolved, ego structures, personal goals, and the cognitive-adaptational heuristics of boys and of girls. Differences in the socialization environments experienced by the 2 sexes can be seen as related to gender differences in personality characteristics. To integrate the empirical findings surrounding gender differences in personality and socialization experience, some conjectures are offered regarding the different self- and world views our current culture may be creating and fostering in males and in females. The potential and even likely influence of biological factors conjoined with the bidirectional effects of child and parent interaction are recognized as confounded with an interpretation in terms of differential socialization. But also, it is noted that until the effects of differential socialization are specifically evaluated by cultural, subcultural, or individual family changes, the role of biological and bidirectional factors cannot be assessed.
父母及社会机构的其他代表在性别上有差异的社会化重点会被加以考量,因为它们会影响男性和女性的人格发展及行为取向。具体而言,会从在男孩和女孩成长的早期、形成阶段所传达的“元信息”的性质方面,对性别差异化的社会化重点、“塑造”行为及教学风格进行评估。这些信息被认为会对男孩和女孩所形成的自我概念、自我结构、个人目标以及认知适应启发法产生不同影响。两性所经历的社会化环境差异可被视为与人格特征方面的性别差异相关。为整合围绕人格和社会化经历中的性别差异的实证研究结果,我们对当前文化可能在男性和女性中塑造并培养的不同自我观和世界观提出了一些推测。生物因素的潜在甚至可能的影响,连同儿童与父母互动的双向效应,被认为与基于差异化社会化的解释相互混淆。但同时也指出,在通过文化、亚文化或个体家庭变化对差异化社会化的影响进行具体评估之前,无法评估生物因素和双向因素的作用。