• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过房室顺序起搏模拟左束支传导阻滞对左心室功能的影响。

Alteration of left ventricular performance by left bundle branch block simulated with atrioventricular sequential pacing.

作者信息

Askenazi J, Alexander J H, Koenigsberg D I, Belic N, Lesch M

出版信息

Am J Cardiol. 1984 Jan 1;53(1):99-104. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(84)90691-x.

DOI:10.1016/0002-9149(84)90691-x
PMID:6691284
Abstract

The effects of atrioventricular (AV) sequential pacing-induced left bundle branch block (LBBB) on left ventricular (LV) performance were evaluated during cardiac catheterization in 9 randomly selected patients being investigated for chest pain. All patients were in normal sinus rhythm with a normal P-R interval and QRS duration. LV performance was assessed by both hemodynamic and angiographic measurements. The maximal rate of LV pressure increase (dP/dt), rate of maximal LV pressure decrease (-dP/dt), LV end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP), end-diastolic volume (LVEDV), end-systolic volume (LVESV), stroke volume and percent ejection (EF) were measured during right atrial and AV sequential pacing at a constant pacing rate. The average pacing rate was 97 +/- 3 beats/min (mean +/- standard error of the mean). In each patient, both dP/dt and -dP/dt decreased significantly (p less than 0.001) during AV sequential pacing compared with atrial pacing at the same rate, from 1,541 +/- 68 to 1,319 +/- 56 mm Hg/s for dP/dt and from 1,506 +/- 86 to 1,276 +/- 92 for -dP/dt. LVEDP did not change significantly when atrial (17 +/- 3 mm Hg) and AV sequential pacing (16 +/- 2 mm Hg) were compared. Mean LVEDV did not change during atrial (135 +/- 13 ml) or AV sequential pacing (137 +/- 14 ml). In contrast, the LVESV during AV sequential pacing was higher by 15 ml (23%) (from 48 +/- 10 to 63 +/- 12 ml) (p less than 0.001); as a result, the stroke volume was lower by 13 ml (15%) and the EF decreased by 10%, from 66 to 56% (-15%).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

在对9例因胸痛接受检查的随机选取患者进行心导管检查期间,评估了房室(AV)顺序起搏诱发的左束支传导阻滞(LBBB)对左心室(LV)功能的影响。所有患者均处于正常窦性心律,P-R间期和QRS时限正常。通过血流动力学和血管造影测量评估LV功能。在右心房起搏和AV顺序起搏时,以恒定起搏频率测量左心室压力最大上升速率(dP/dt)、左心室压力最大下降速率(-dP/dt)、左心室舒张末期压力(LVEDP)、舒张末期容积(LVEDV)、收缩末期容积(LVESV)、每搏量和射血百分比(EF)。平均起搏频率为97±3次/分钟(均值±均值标准误差)。在每位患者中,与相同频率的心房起搏相比,AV顺序起搏期间dP/dt和-dP/dt均显著降低(p<0.001),dP/dt从1541±68降至1319±56mmHg/s,-dP/dt从1506±86降至1276±92。比较心房起搏(17±3mmHg)和AV顺序起搏(16±2mmHg)时,LVEDP无显著变化。心房起搏(135±13ml)或AV顺序起搏(137±14ml)期间,平均LVEDV无变化。相比之下,AV顺序起搏期间LVESV高15ml(23%)(从48±10增至63±12ml)(p<0.001);结果,每搏量低13ml(15%),EF降低10%,从66%降至56%(-15%)。(摘要截断于250字)

相似文献

1
Alteration of left ventricular performance by left bundle branch block simulated with atrioventricular sequential pacing.通过房室顺序起搏模拟左束支传导阻滞对左心室功能的影响。
Am J Cardiol. 1984 Jan 1;53(1):99-104. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(84)90691-x.
2
Contribution of atrioventricular synchrony to left ventricular systolic function in a closed-chest canine model of complete heart block: implications for single-chamber rate-variable cardiac pacing.房室同步性对完全性心脏传导阻滞的闭胸犬模型左心室收缩功能的作用:对单腔频率可变心脏起搏的启示
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1988 Apr;11(4):404-12. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1988.tb05999.x.
3
The effects of pacing-induced left bundle branch block on left ventricular systolic and diastolic performances.起搏诱发的左束支传导阻滞对左心室收缩和舒张功能的影响。
Jpn Heart J. 1990 May;31(3):309-17. doi: 10.1536/ihj.31.309.
4
The hemodynamic effect of intrinsic conduction during left ventricular pacing as compared to biventricular pacing.与双心室起搏相比,左心室起搏时固有传导的血流动力学效应。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005 Dec 20;46(12):2305-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.02.098.
5
Contribution of left ventricular contraction to the generation of right ventricular systolic pressure in the human heart.左心室收缩对人体心脏右心室收缩压产生的作用。
Circulation. 1985 Mar;71(3):473-80. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.71.3.473.
6
AV pacing and LV performance.心房心室起搏与左心室功能
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1983 May;6(3 Pt 1):631-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1983.tb05305.x.
7
Adjusting the timing of left-ventricular pacing using electrocardiogram and device electrograms.使用心电图和器械电图调整左心室起搏的时间。
Europace. 2011 Oct;13(10):1464-70. doi: 10.1093/europace/eur146. Epub 2011 May 19.
8
Acute biventricular hemodynamic effects of cardiac resynchronization therapy in right bundle branch block.心脏再同步治疗对右束支传导阻滞患者双心室血液动力学的急性影响。
Heart Rhythm. 2018 Oct;15(10):1525-1532. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2018.05.017. Epub 2018 May 23.
9
Intra-ventricular resynchronization for optimal left ventricular function during pacing in experimental left bundle branch block.实验性左束支传导阻滞起搏期间实现左心室功能最佳化的心室内再同步化
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003 Aug 6;42(3):558-67. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(03)00641-7.
10
Improved cardiovascular hemodynamics with atrioventricular sequential pacing compared with ventricular demand pacing.与心室按需起搏相比,房室顺序起搏可改善心血管血流动力学。
Ann Thorac Surg. 1984 Sep;38(3):260-4. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(10)62248-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Heart Failure and Wide QRS: Clinical and Pharmacological Perspectives.心力衰竭与宽QRS波:临床与药理学视角
Biomedicines. 2025 Jun 13;13(6):1462. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines13061462.
2
[History of cardiac resynchronization therapy : 30 years of electrotherapeutic management for heart failure].[心脏再同步治疗的历史:心力衰竭的30年电治疗管理]
Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol. 2024 Mar;35(Suppl 1):68-76. doi: 10.1007/s00399-024-01004-2. Epub 2024 Feb 29.
3
The therapeutic benefit of upgrade to cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with pacing-induced cardiomyopathy.
升级为心脏再同步治疗对起搏诱导性心肌病患者的治疗益处。
Heart Rhythm O2. 2023 Jan 25;4(4):225-231. doi: 10.1016/j.hroo.2023.01.004. eCollection 2023 Apr.
4
Prediction of Deterioration of Left Ventricular Function Using 3-Dimensional Speckle-Tracking Echocardiography in Patients With Left Bundle-Branch Block.左束支传导阻滞患者的三维斑点追踪超声心动图预测左心室功能恶化。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2023 Jan 3;12(1):e026194. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.122.026194. Epub 2022 Dec 30.
5
The therapeutic effects of upgrade to cardiac resynchronization therapy in pacing-induced cardiomyopathy or chronic right ventricular pacing patients: a meta-analysis.升级为心脏再同步治疗对起搏诱导性心肌病或慢性右心室起搏患者的治疗效果:一项荟萃分析。
Heart Fail Rev. 2022 Mar;27(2):507-516. doi: 10.1007/s10741-021-10091-z. Epub 2021 Feb 27.
6
Role of coronary flow regulation and cardiac-coronary coupling in mechanical dyssynchrony associated with right ventricular pacing.冠状动脉血流调节和心脏-冠状动脉耦合在右心室起搏相关机械性不同步中的作用。
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2021 Mar 1;320(3):H1037-H1054. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00549.2020. Epub 2020 Dec 24.
7
How His bundle pacing prevents and reverses heart failure induced by right ventricular pacing.希氏束起搏预防和逆转右心室起搏致心力衰竭的机制
Heart Fail Rev. 2021 Nov;26(6):1311-1324. doi: 10.1007/s10741-020-09962-8.
8
Left ventricular contractile reserve by stress echocardiography as a predictor of response to cardiac resynchronization therapy in heart failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis.通过负荷超声心动图评估左心室收缩储备作为心力衰竭患者心脏再同步治疗反应预测指标的系统评价和荟萃分析
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2017 Aug 16;17(1):223. doi: 10.1186/s12872-017-0657-4.
9
The Prognostic Impact of New-Onset Persistent Left Bundle Branch Block Following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: A Meta-analysis.经导管主动脉瓣植入术后新发持续性左束支传导阻滞的预后影响:一项荟萃分析。
Clin Cardiol. 2016 Sep;39(9):544-50. doi: 10.1002/clc.22567. Epub 2016 Jul 19.
10
Cardiac contractility modulation therapy in advanced systolic heart failure.心脏收缩力调节治疗在晚期收缩性心力衰竭中的应用。
Nat Rev Cardiol. 2013 Oct;10(10):584-98. doi: 10.1038/nrcardio.2013.114. Epub 2013 Aug 13.