Elkayam U, Wilson A F, Morrison J, Meltzer P, Davis J, Klosterman P, Louvier J, Henry W L
Thorax. 1984 Feb;39(2):107-13. doi: 10.1136/thx.39.2.107.
A new single breath test has been developed that measures pulmonary blood flow (Qc) and pulmonary tissue volume by using the fact that Qc is proportional to the relationship between the absorption rate of acetylene (C2H2) from the alveolar gas and the rate of change of lung volume during constant expiratory flow. To make these measurements a bag in bottle system with a rolling seal spirometer, a mass spectrometer, and a minicomputer with analogue to digital conversion have been used. Qc was compared with cardiac output measured by the thermodilution technique in 20 patients with cardiac disease; some also had mild chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The mean (SD) resting Qc for the group was 5.27 (1.22) l/min and the cardiac output measured by thermodilution was 5.30 (1.31) l/min. The mean difference between the two estimations of cardiac output was 0.03 l and the standard deviation of this difference was 0.76 l. The Qc technique was not successful in patients with an FEV1/FVC less than 60%, but seemed to be accurate in those with higher FEV1/FVC values. Correction of Qc for the effect of venous admixture in 14 patients resulted in an average 19% overestimation of cardiac output (6.01 (2.52) l/min v 5.05 (1.64) l/min). It is concluded that cardiac output can be accurately measured in patients with cardiac or mild pulmonary disease. No correction for venous admixture due to ventilation-perfusion mismatch was necessary in these patients, presumably because the large breath used by the technique overcomes most mild ventilation-perfusion maldistribution. These findings, in addition to the non-invasive nature of the technique, suggest potential value for the measurement of cardiac output in various clinical conditions.
一种新的单次呼吸测试方法已被开发出来,该方法通过利用肺血流量(Qc)与肺泡气中乙炔(C2H2)吸收速率和恒定呼气流量期间肺容积变化率之间的关系成正比这一事实,来测量肺血流量(Qc)和肺组织容积。为了进行这些测量,使用了带有滚动密封肺活量计的瓶中袋系统、质谱仪以及具有模数转换功能的小型计算机。在20例心脏病患者中,将Qc与通过热稀释技术测量的心输出量进行了比较;其中一些患者还患有轻度慢性阻塞性肺疾病。该组患者静息状态下Qc的平均值(标准差)为5.27(1.22)升/分钟,通过热稀释法测量的心输出量为5.30(1.31)升/分钟。两种心输出量估计值之间的平均差异为0.03升,该差异的标准差为0.76升。对于第一秒用力呼气容积/用力肺活量(FEV1/FVC)小于60%的患者,Qc技术并不成功,但对于FEV1/FVC值较高的患者似乎是准确的。对14例患者的静脉混合效应进行Qc校正后,心输出量平均高估了19%(6.01(2.52)升/分钟对5.05(1.64)升/分钟)。结论是,在患有心脏病或轻度肺病的患者中,可以准确测量心输出量。在这些患者中,无需因通气-灌注不匹配而对静脉混合进行校正,大概是因为该技术使用的大呼吸克服了大多数轻度通气-灌注分布不均。这些发现,再加上该技术的非侵入性,表明在各种临床情况下测量心输出量具有潜在价值。