Lanza F L, Nelson R S, Rack M F
J Clin Pharmacol. 1984 Feb-Mar;24(2-3):89-95. doi: 10.1002/j.1552-4604.1984.tb02770.x.
Sixty volunteers were endoscopically evaluated to compare gastric mucosal injury following oral administration of sulindac, naproxen, aspirin, or placebo for two consecutive seven-day periods. A single-blind technique was utilized wherein the endoscopist was unaware which drug each volunteer had received. The following dosages were employed for the two study periods: sulindac, 150 and 200 mg, b.i.d., naproxen, 250 and 375 mg, b.i.d., and aspirin, 650 and 975 mg, q.i.d. The only subject who developed a frank ulcer with mucosal bleeding was in the sulindac group, however volunteers taking sulindac demonstrated statistically less significant mucosal injury on endoscopic examination than those receiving naproxen or aspirin.
对60名志愿者进行了内镜评估,以比较连续两个7天期间口服舒林酸、萘普生、阿司匹林或安慰剂后胃黏膜损伤情况。采用单盲技术,内镜检查人员不知道每位志愿者服用的是哪种药物。两个研究期间使用的剂量如下:舒林酸,150毫克和200毫克,每日两次;萘普生,250毫克和375毫克,每日两次;阿司匹林,650毫克和975毫克,每日四次。唯一出现伴有黏膜出血的明显溃疡的受试者在舒林酸组,然而,在内镜检查中,服用舒林酸的志愿者黏膜损伤的统计学意义低于服用萘普生或阿司匹林的志愿者。