Suppr超能文献

液态血液培养基的体外比较

In vitro comparison of fluid blood culture media.

作者信息

Simon C, Kreller G, Bahr A, Kiosz D

出版信息

Infection. 1984 Mar-Apr;12(2):64-7. doi: 10.1007/BF01641672.

Abstract

Eight fluid blood culture media from different manufacturers were compared with regard to their ability to culture fastidious microorganisms. In turbidity measurements following inoculation with different bacteria, the media differed with respect to the duration of the lag phase and the log phase of bacterial growth. Similar differences were observed with small inocula in original blood culture bottles (commercially available). Fastidious microorganisms grew better in Supplemented Peptone Broth II (Becton-Dickinson), BHI Roche and BHI bioMérieux. Meningococci could only be cultured in four of the eight media tested, and pneumococci in seven of the eight media (with different velocities of growth). Haemophilus influenzae showed the best results after adding blood or IsoVitalex BBL.

摘要

对来自不同制造商的八种液体血液培养基培养苛养微生物的能力进行了比较。在接种不同细菌后的浊度测量中,各培养基在细菌生长的延迟期和对数期的持续时间方面存在差异。在原装血液培养瓶(市售)中接种少量菌时也观察到类似差异。苛养微生物在补充蛋白胨肉汤II(Becton-Dickinson)、罗氏脑心浸液培养基和bioMérieux脑心浸液培养基中生长得更好。脑膜炎球菌仅能在测试的八种培养基中的四种中培养,肺炎球菌能在八种培养基中的七种中培养(生长速度不同)。添加血液或IsoVitalex BBL后,流感嗜血杆菌的培养结果最佳。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验