Suppr超能文献

二十三种血培养基的评估

Evaluation of twenty-three blood culture media.

作者信息

Babu J P, Schell R F, Le Frock J L

出版信息

J Clin Microbiol. 1978 Sep;8(3):288-92. doi: 10.1128/jcm.8.3.288-292.1978.

Abstract

Several investigators have evaluated clinically a variety of commercially available blood culture media. No agreement has been reached as to which of these media is optimal for detection of bacteremia. The purpose of this study was to determine the rate of recovery of microorganisms from various blood culture media. A total of 23 blood culture media were inoculated with 7 to 15 microorganisms per bottle in the presence or absence of an erythrocyte-serum mixture. The results demonstrated that blood culture media differed in their ability to support the growth of microorganisms. At 4 days after inoculation, only 10 of the 23 blood culture media supported the growth of 91% (10 of the 11) or more of the test microorganisms. The recovery rate of microorganisms depended not only upon the type of medium but also upon the manufacturer of the type of blood culture medium. The addition of an erythrocyte-serum mixture to the blood culture media did not influence the difference in the recovery rate of microorganisms among media and the same type of medium prepared by different manufacturers. The majority (15 of the 23) of the blood culture media supplemented with the erythrocyte-serum mixture failed to support the growth of 91% or more of the test microorganisms at 4 days after inoculation. These results have demonstrated that blood culture media need to be improved. Better quality control measures should also be implemented to evaluate commercial blood culture media.

摘要

几位研究者已对多种市售血培养培养基进行了临床评估。对于这些培养基中哪种最适合检测菌血症,尚未达成共识。本研究的目的是确定从各种血培养培养基中回收微生物的比率。在有或没有红细胞 - 血清混合物存在的情况下,向每个瓶子接种7至15种微生物,共接种23种血培养培养基。结果表明,血培养培养基在支持微生物生长的能力方面存在差异。接种后4天,23种血培养培养基中只有10种能支持91%(11种中的10种)或更多的测试微生物生长。微生物的回收率不仅取决于培养基的类型,还取决于血培养培养基类型的制造商。向血培养培养基中添加红细胞 - 血清混合物不会影响不同培养基之间以及不同制造商制备的同一类型培养基之间微生物回收率的差异。接种后4天,大多数(23种中的15种)添加了红细胞 - 血清混合物的血培养培养基未能支持91%或更多的测试微生物生长。这些结果表明血培养培养基需要改进。还应实施更好的质量控制措施来评估市售血培养培养基。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of twenty-three blood culture media.二十三种血培养基的评估
J Clin Microbiol. 1978 Sep;8(3):288-92. doi: 10.1128/jcm.8.3.288-292.1978.
2
Evaluation of ten anaerobic blood culture media.
Am J Clin Pathol. 1979 Aug;72(2):199-203. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/72.2.199.
7
Detection of fungi in blood cultures.血培养中真菌的检测
J Clin Microbiol. 1975 Mar;1(3):309-10. doi: 10.1128/jcm.1.3.309-310.1975.

引用本文的文献

4
In vitro comparison of fluid blood culture media.液态血液培养基的体外比较
Infection. 1984 Mar-Apr;12(2):64-7. doi: 10.1007/BF01641672.
7
Detection time for blood culture isolates using a biphasic medium.
Eur J Clin Microbiol. 1983 Feb;2(1):54-5. doi: 10.1007/BF02019926.
8
Blood cultures: where do we stand?血培养:我们目前的状况如何?
J Clin Pathol. 1988 Jun;41(6):668-70. doi: 10.1136/jcp.41.6.668.

本文引用的文献

1
Blood culture; a clinical laboratory study of two methods.
Am J Clin Pathol. 1951 Aug;21(8):785-8.
4
Rapid diagnosis of bacteremia.菌血症的快速诊断
Appl Microbiol. 1969 Sep;18(3):458-63. doi: 10.1128/am.18.3.458-463.1969.
5
New medium for blood cultures.用于血培养的新型培养基。
Appl Microbiol. 1969 Jan;17(1):68-70. doi: 10.1128/am.17.1.68-70.1969.
9
Comparison of two blood culture systems.
Am J Clin Pathol. 1974 Jun;61(6):856-8. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/61.6.856.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验