Bowman P I, Ahearn D G
J Clin Microbiol. 1976 Jul;4(1):49-53. doi: 10.1128/jcm.4.1.49-53.1976.
The Analytab Products Inc. (API), Micro-Drop (MD), and Uni-Yeast-Tek (UYT) systems for the presumptive identification of common clinical yeast isolates were compared with the oxidation-fermentation (OF) and a conventional procedure. With 229 coded isolates, the identification accuracies were API 94, MD 83, OF 82, and UYT 99%. The API system required the greatest technical ability. The MD materials were prone to malfunction. OF media, if incubated beyond 14 days, gave an accuracy of 87%, but this offered no advantage over the conventional procedure. The UYT system was the easiest to use.
对Analytab Products Inc.(API)、Micro-Drop(MD)和Uni-Yeast-Tek(UYT)系统用于初步鉴定常见临床酵母分离株的情况与氧化发酵(OF)法及传统方法进行了比较。对于229株编码分离株,鉴定准确率分别为:API 94%、MD 83%、OF 82%、UYT 99%。API系统需要最高的技术能力。MD材料容易出现故障。OF培养基若培养超过14天,准确率为87%,但与传统方法相比并无优势。UYT系统使用起来最简便。