Malischewski C M, Sybrecht G W, Fabel H
Anasth Intensivther Notfallmed. 1980 Dec;15(6):470-8.
The depressant effects of four potent analgesics on the respiration were studied in 9 healthy young persons by determining the CO2 response (Read's method) and the mouth occlusion pressure (Whitelaw's method) before and after administration of the drugs and with or without interposition of additional inspiratory resistance (Rin). The analgesics tested were: Mr. 1268 = M1; pentazocine = M2; tramadol = M3; Mr. 1353 = M4. M1 and M2 induced a marked reduction in the ventilatory CO2 response (56.2 per cent +/- 21.8 for M1 and 53.8 per cent +/- 17.1 for M2). Interposition of Rin reduced the response to 43.9 per cent +/- 15.5 and 41.7 per cent +/- 17.3 respectively of the normal value. The occlusion pressure fell to 54.3 +/- 17 and 49.4 per cent +!- 22.2 respectively. After interposition of Rin the values were reduced 89 per cent +/- 27.3 and 79.9 +/- 29 respectively from the original value of 152.2 +!- 34.6. Administration of M3 or M4 did not significantly affect either the CO2 response or the occlusion pressure, nor had interposition of Rin any effect. M1 and M2 also induced changes in the ratio central stimulus P100/resultant flow (VT/Ti), viz.: M1 +/- SD: 77.1 per cent +/- 7.1; M2 +/- SD: 77.3 +/- 14.1. M3 and M4 had no significant effect M3 = 92.3 per cent +/- 9.1; M4 = 93.9 per cent +/- 13.3). The data indicate that the two methods make it possible to quantify that the two methods make it possible to quantify the respiratory depression induced by drugs and to differentiate between central respiratory depression and additional impairment of respiratory mechanics.
通过在9名健康年轻人中测定给药前后以及有无附加吸气阻力(Rin)介入时的二氧化碳反应(Read法)和口腔阻断压(Whitelaw法),研究了四种强效镇痛药对呼吸的抑制作用。所测试的镇痛药有:Mr. 1268 = M1;喷他佐辛 = M2;曲马多 = M3;Mr. 1353 = M4。M1和M2引起通气二氧化碳反应显著降低(M1为56.2%±21.8,M2为53.8%±17.1)。Rin介入后,反应分别降至正常值的43.9%±15.5和41.7%±17.3。阻断压分别降至54.3±17和49.4%±22.2。Rin介入后,数值分别比原始值152.2±34.6降低了89%±27.3和79.9±29。给予M3或M4对二氧化碳反应或阻断压均无显著影响,Rin介入也无任何作用。M1和M2还引起中枢刺激P100/合成气流(VT/Ti)比值的变化,即:M1±标准差:77.1%±7.1;M2±标准差:77.3±14.1。M3和M4无显著影响(M3 = 92.3%±9.1;M4 = 93.9%±13.3)。数据表明,这两种方法能够量化药物引起的呼吸抑制,并区分中枢性呼吸抑制和呼吸力学的附加损害。