• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

线索提示对失语症患者图片命名的影响。

The effects of cuing on picture naming in aphasia.

作者信息

Pease D M, Goodglass H

出版信息

Cortex. 1978 Jun;14(2):178-89. doi: 10.1016/s0010-9452(78)80043-4.

DOI:10.1016/s0010-9452(78)80043-4
PMID:679699
Abstract

This study compared the facilitative values of six types of cue for eliciting picture naming responses from Brocas, Wernickes, and anomic aphasics. Degree of responsivity to cues was inversely related to severity of naming disorder. Type of cue, severity of naming disorder, and diagnostic category contributed significantly to the results obtained, though the diagnostic groups did not show differential patterns of response to the cues. First Sounds and Completion sentences were the most effective cues. The finding of diagnostic group differences in degree of responsivity to cues, without differential sensitivity to type of cue, was interpreted as indicating that a single factor might account for group differences in ability to benefit from cuing.

摘要

本研究比较了六种线索对布罗卡失语症患者、韦尼克失语症患者和命名性失语症患者引发图片命名反应的辅助价值。对线索的反应程度与命名障碍的严重程度呈负相关。线索类型、命名障碍的严重程度和诊断类别对所得结果有显著影响,尽管诊断组对线索的反应模式没有差异。首音提示和完成句子是最有效的线索。在对线索的反应程度上存在诊断组差异,但对线索类型没有差异敏感性,这一发现被解释为表明可能有一个单一因素导致了不同组在从线索提示中获益能力上的差异。

相似文献

1
The effects of cuing on picture naming in aphasia.线索提示对失语症患者图片命名的影响。
Cortex. 1978 Jun;14(2):178-89. doi: 10.1016/s0010-9452(78)80043-4.
2
Naming to picture versus description in three aphasic subgroups.三种失语亚组中对图片命名与描述命名的比较
Cortex. 1979 Jun;15(2):199-211. doi: 10.1016/s0010-9452(79)80025-8.
3
Effects of word-onset cuing on picture naming in aphasia: a reconsideration.
Brain Lang. 1990 Oct;39(3):373-90. doi: 10.1016/0093-934x(90)90146-8.
4
What Does a Cue Do? Comparing Phonological and Semantic Cues for Picture Naming in Aphasia.线索有什么作用?比较失语症中图片命名的语音和语义线索
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2018 Mar 15;61(3):658-674. doi: 10.1044/2017_JSLHR-L-17-0214.
5
The semantic deficit in aphasia: the relationship between semantic errors in auditory comprehension and picture naming.失语症中的语义缺陷:听觉理解中的语义错误与图片命名之间的关系。
Neuropsychologia. 1984;22(4):409-26. doi: 10.1016/0028-3932(84)90036-8.
6
The effects of single versus combined cue presentations on picture naming by aphasic adults.单一提示呈现与组合提示呈现对失语症成年人图片命名的影响。
J Commun Disord. 1983 Mar;16(2):111-21. doi: 10.1016/0021-9924(83)90042-4.
7
The effectiveness of simultaneous cues on naming disturbance in aphasia.
J Commun Disord. 1986 Aug;19(4):261-70. doi: 10.1016/0021-9924(86)90032-8.
8
Organization of and access to semantic memory in aphasia.失语症中语义记忆的组织与获取
Brain Lang. 1987 Mar;30(2):321-37. doi: 10.1016/0093-934x(87)90106-4.
9
Category, semantic field and naming in aphasics.
Neurol Psychiatr (Bucur). 1988 Jul-Sep;26(3):153-69.
10
Effect of auditory prestimulation on naming in aphasia.听觉预刺激对失语症命名的影响。
J Speech Hear Res. 1977 Dec;20(4):669-83. doi: 10.1044/jshr.2004.669.

引用本文的文献

1
Less is more: neural mechanisms underlying anomia treatment in chronic aphasic patients.少即是多:慢性失语症患者命名障碍治疗的神经机制。
Brain. 2017 Nov 1;140(11):3039-3054. doi: 10.1093/brain/awx234.
2
Effect of cues on object naming in first-grade good and poor readers.线索对一年级优秀和较差阅读者物体命名的影响。
Ann Dyslexia. 1989 Jan;39(1):116-24. doi: 10.1007/BF02656904.
3
Communicative value of self cues in aphasia: A re-evaluation.失语症中自我线索的交际价值:重新评估
Aphasiology. 2006 Jul 1;20(7):684-704. doi: 10.1080/02687030500334076.
4
Deficits of knowledge versus executive control in semantic cognition: insights from cued naming.语义认知中知识与执行控制的缺陷:线索命名的启示
Neuropsychologia. 2008 Jan 31;46(2):649-58. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.09.007. Epub 2007 Sep 18.
5
The tip-of-the-tongue phenomenon: blocking or partial activation?
Mem Cognit. 1992 Nov;20(6):715-26. doi: 10.3758/bf03202721.