Suppr超能文献

咪达唑仑和硫喷妥钠用于外科重症患者麻醉诱导的心血管效应

Cardiovascular effects of midazolam and thiopentone for induction of anaesthesia in ill surgical patients.

作者信息

Lebowitz P W, Cote M E, Daniels A L, Martyn J A, Teplick R S, Davison J K, Sunder N

出版信息

Can Anaesth Soc J. 1983 Jan;30(1):19-23. doi: 10.1007/BF03007711.

Abstract

The cardiovascular effects of midazolam (0.15 mg kg-1) and thiopentone (3.0 mg kg-1) were compared during induction of anaesthesia in 20 American Society of Anesthesiologists class III patients. In patients given thiopentone (N = 11), cardiac output, mean arterial pressure, heart rate, and systemic vascular resistance all decreased significantly over the course of the study period; mean right atrial pressure rose slightly, and stroke volume remained the same. Patients receiving midazolam (N = 9) experienced similar haemodynamic changes which were significant relative to baseline only for the fall in mean arterial pressure and the rise in mean right atrial pressure at ten minutes. There were no significant differences between the two groups. Midazolam thus appears to be at least as acceptable an induction agent as thiopentone in ill patients, from a haemodynamic point of view.

摘要

在20例美国麻醉医师协会III级患者的麻醉诱导过程中,比较了咪达唑仑(0.15毫克/千克)和硫喷妥钠(3.0毫克/千克)的心血管效应。给予硫喷妥钠的患者(N = 11),在研究期间心输出量、平均动脉压、心率和全身血管阻力均显著下降;平均右心房压略有上升,每搏量保持不变。接受咪达唑仑的患者(N = 9)经历了类似的血流动力学变化,仅在十分钟时平均动脉压下降和平均右心房压上升相对于基线有显著变化。两组之间无显著差异。因此,从血流动力学角度来看,在病情较差的患者中,咪达唑仑似乎至少与硫喷妥钠一样是可接受的诱导药物。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验