• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

当前主诉的预测价值。

The predictive value of the presenting complaint.

作者信息

Burack R C, Carpenter R R

出版信息

J Fam Pract. 1983 Apr;16(4):749-54.

PMID:6833963
Abstract

The relationship between the presenting complaint and the principal problem identified during 103 new patient visits was assessed in an academic primary care setting. Complaints and problems were classified by content as somatic, psychosocial, or health maintenance and compared by category. The presenting complaint correctly identified the category in 76 percent of somatic but only 6 percent of psychosocial principal problems (sensitivity of 76 percent and 6 percent, respectively). The likelihood of a same-category principal problem (positive predictive value) ranged from 53 percent for somatic to 100 percent for psychosocial presenting complaints. A specific underlying motivation for the visit other than the presenting complaint was noted by the primary provider in 42 percent of the encounters and was most frequent in those encounters characterized by a lack of concordance between complaint and problem. The presenting complaint introduces the clinical encounter, but its value is limited in specifically identifying the principal problem.

摘要

在一个学术性初级保健机构中,对103例新患者就诊时的主诉与所确定的主要问题之间的关系进行了评估。根据内容将主诉和问题分类为躯体性、心理社会性或健康维护性,并按类别进行比较。主诉在76%的躯体性主要问题中正确识别了类别,但在心理社会性主要问题中仅为6%(敏感性分别为76%和6%)。同一类别主要问题的可能性(阳性预测值)从躯体性主诉的53%到心理社会性主诉的100%不等。在42%的就诊中,初级医疗服务提供者指出了除主诉之外此次就诊的特定潜在动机,并且在那些主诉与问题不一致的就诊中最为常见。主诉开启了临床诊疗过程,但其在明确识别主要问题方面的价值有限。

相似文献

1
The predictive value of the presenting complaint.当前主诉的预测价值。
J Fam Pract. 1983 Apr;16(4):749-54.
2
Patients' complaints in a hospital emergency department in Singapore.新加坡一家医院急诊科患者的投诉。
Singapore Med J. 2007 Nov;48(11):990-5.
3
National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey: 2001 summary.国家门诊医疗护理调查:2001年总结
Adv Data. 2003 Aug 11(337):1-44.
4
Are clinical impressions of adolescent substance use accurate?对青少年物质使用的临床印象准确吗?
Pediatrics. 2004 Nov;114(5):e536-40. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-0098.
5
Identifying asthma exacerbations in a pediatric emergency department: a feasibility study.在儿科急诊科识别哮喘急性发作:一项可行性研究。
Int J Med Inform. 2007 Jul;76(7):557-64. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2006.03.003. Epub 2006 May 2.
6
Purpose of the medical encounter: identification and influence on process and outcome in 200 encounters in a model family practice center.医疗问诊目的:在一家示范家庭医疗中心的200次问诊中对过程及结果的识别与影响
J Fam Pract. 1980 Mar;10(3):495-500.
7
Provision of primary care by office-based rheumatologists: results from the National Ambulatory Medical Care Surveys, 1991-1995.基于办公室的风湿病学家提供初级保健服务:1991 - 1995年国家门诊医疗调查结果
Arthritis Rheum. 1999 Mar;42(3):409-14. doi: 10.1002/1529-0131(199904)42:3<409::AID-ANR3>3.0.CO;2-R.
8
Case histories for understanding depression in primary care.
J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2003 Aug;103(8 Suppl 4):S16-8.
9
A new look at low back complaints in primary care: a RAMBAM Israeli Family Practice Research Network study.基层医疗中腰痛问题的新视角:一项拉姆巴姆以色列家庭医疗研究网络的研究。
J Fam Pract. 1999 Apr;48(4):299-303.
10
[Prospective study of favorable factors in follow-up of drug addicted patients--apropos of 257 patients of the Cassini Center in Paris].药物成瘾患者随访中有利因素的前瞻性研究——关于巴黎卡西尼中心的257例患者
Encephale. 2000 Nov-Dec;26(6):11-20.

引用本文的文献

1
Patient-centered communication: do patients really prefer it?以患者为中心的沟通:患者真的更喜欢这种方式吗?
J Gen Intern Med. 2004 Nov;19(11):1069-79. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2004.30384.x.
2
Cochrane Lecture 1997. What evidence do we need for evidence based medicine?1997年考克兰讲座。循证医学需要哪些证据?
J Epidemiol Community Health. 1997 Dec;51(6):623-9. doi: 10.1136/jech.51.6.623.
3
How does the content of consultations affect the recognition by general practitioners of major depression in women?会诊内容如何影响全科医生对女性重度抑郁症的识别?
Br J Gen Pract. 1995 Nov;45(400):575-8.
4
Identifying the agenda in the consultation.确定会诊中的议程。
Br J Gen Pract. 1995 Jan;45(390):52-3.
5
The medical interview and psychosocial aspects of medicine: block curricula for residents.医学访谈与医学的社会心理层面:住院医师的模块课程
J Gen Intern Med. 1992 Mar-Apr;7(2):235-42. doi: 10.1007/BF02598023.