Aldridge K E, Stratton C W, Patterson L S, Evans M E, Hodges R L
J Clin Microbiol. 1983 Mar;17(3):516-20. doi: 10.1128/jcm.17.3.516-520.1983.
The Staph-Ident system (Analytab Products) for species identification of coagulase-negative staphylococci was compared with the conventional method of Kloos and Schleifer (21). A total of 101 clinical isolates from urine cultures and 95 clinical isolates from blood cultures were studied: overall agreement between the two methods was 86%. We concluded that the Staph-Ident system is a practical test for most clinical microbiology laboratories and that results obtained from this rapid test are comparable to those obtained from the more cumbersome conventional method. Additional investigations are needed to determine the clinical relevance of such species identification.
将用于凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌菌种鉴定的葡萄球菌鉴定系统(Analytab产品公司)与Kloos和Schleifer的传统方法(21)进行了比较。共研究了101株来自尿液培养的临床分离株和95株来自血液培养的临床分离株:两种方法的总体一致性为86%。我们得出结论,葡萄球菌鉴定系统对大多数临床微生物实验室来说是一种实用的检测方法,并且从这种快速检测获得的结果与从更繁琐的传统方法获得的结果相当。需要进行更多研究以确定这种菌种鉴定的临床相关性。