Indraprasit S, Namwongprom A, Sooksriwongse C, Buri P S
Nephron. 1983;34(1):45-7. doi: 10.1159/000182977.
Peritoneal dialysis was performed in 18 uremic patients using both room temperature (27-31 degrees C) and prewarmed (37 degrees C) dialysate. There were no significant differences between the two periods of the following parameters: urea clearance, creatinine clearance, inulin clearance, ratio of inulin to urea clearance, ratio of inulin to creatinine clearance, drainage volume, dialysate flow rate, ultrafiltration rate and total protein loss. Since the peritoneal dialysis efficiency was not improved by warming dialysate in this range of temperature, the warming procedure is not necessary in the countries where the average room temperature is 29 degrees C (27-31 degrees C). The exclusion of this procedure will decrease the work load and lessen the chance of dialysate contamination.
对18名尿毒症患者进行了腹膜透析，分别使用室温（27 - 31摄氏度）和预热至37摄氏度的透析液。在以下参数的两个阶段之间没有显著差异：尿素清除率、肌酐清除率、菊粉清除率、菊粉与尿素清除率之比、菊粉与肌酐清除率之比、引流量、透析液流速、超滤率和总蛋白丢失量。由于在这个温度范围内加热透析液并不能提高腹膜透析效率，在平均室温为29摄氏度（27 - 31摄氏度）的国家，加热程序没有必要。排除这个程序将减少工作量并降低透析液污染的几率。
