Simbruner G, Gregory G A
Crit Care Med. 1981 Jul;9(7):509-14.
The authors tested the ability of 6 neonatal ventilators (Baby bird, Bourns BP-200, Veriflo, Bourns LS, ServoVent, SI-75) to deliver a preset tidal volume with minimal pressures when the compliance and resistance of test lung were altered. The authors also studied the effects of gas leaks from the system and the effects of PEEP. When the ventilator cycling rates exceeded 28-43/min, gas trapping occurred despite compliances and resistance appropriate for a healthy term infant. With a normal compliance and an elevated resistance, gas trapping occurred above rates of 4-6/min. Under these same conditions (normal compliance, elevated resistance), only 24-46% of the preset tidal volume was delivered. The different ventilators caused the pressure within the test lung to exceed 5, 10, and 15 cm H2O for differing amounts of time (sec)/min.
作者测试了6台新生儿呼吸机(小鸟牌、伯恩斯BP - 200、Veriflo、伯恩斯LS、ServoVent、SI - 75)在测试肺的顺应性和阻力改变时,以最小压力输送预设潮气量的能力。作者还研究了系统气体泄漏的影响以及呼气末正压(PEEP)的影响。当呼吸机的循环频率超过28 - 43次/分钟时,尽管顺应性和阻力适合足月健康婴儿,但仍会发生气体潴留。在正常顺应性和阻力升高的情况下,气体潴留发生在频率超过4 - 6次/分钟时。在这些相同条件下(正常顺应性、阻力升高),仅能输送预设潮气量的24 - 46%。不同的呼吸机使测试肺内压力在不同的时间(秒)/分钟内超过5、10和15厘米水柱。