• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

日本乳腺癌家族易感性的流行病学

Epidemiology of familial predisposition for breast cancer in Japan.

作者信息

Murata M, Kuno K, Fukami A, Sakamoto G

出版信息

J Natl Cancer Inst. 1982 Dec;69(6):1229-34.

PMID:6958901
Abstract

The physical and reproductive traits known to be risk factors for breast cancer were correlated with familial predisposition for this disease by the use of hospital records of 3,867 patients with breast cancer, of whom 186 had one or more relatives with breast cancer and were called "familial patients." Various characteristics in the total series of patients were compared with familial patients matched for year of birth. The mean age at menarche was significantly less in familial compared with the total series of patients, especially for premenopausal patients; however, no difference was observed in the mean age at marriage between the two groups. Familial patients were slightly taller as compared to the total series of patients, but no difference was detected in body weight between the two groups. Because age at menarche and the stature are highly correlated, they may be influenced by an underlying common hormone effect that may influence the familial nature of breast cancer.

摘要

通过查阅3867例乳腺癌患者的医院记录,将已知的乳腺癌风险因素(身体特征和生殖特征)与该疾病的家族易感性进行关联分析。其中186例患者有一个或多个患乳腺癌的亲属,被称为“家族性患者”。将所有患者的各种特征与按出生年份匹配的家族性患者进行比较。家族性患者的月经初潮平均年龄明显低于所有患者,尤其是绝经前患者;然而,两组之间的平均结婚年龄没有差异。与所有患者相比,家族性患者略高,但两组之间的体重没有差异。由于月经初潮年龄和身高高度相关,它们可能受潜在的共同激素效应影响,而这种效应可能影响乳腺癌的家族特性。

相似文献

1
Epidemiology of familial predisposition for breast cancer in Japan.日本乳腺癌家族易感性的流行病学
J Natl Cancer Inst. 1982 Dec;69(6):1229-34.
2
Prophylactic Oophorectomy: Reducing the U.S. Death Rate from Epithelial Ovarian Cancer. A Continuing Debate.预防性卵巢切除术:降低美国上皮性卵巢癌死亡率。一场持续的争论。
Oncologist. 1996;1(5):326-330.
3
[Familiality of breast cancer and hereditary factors].[乳腺癌的家族性与遗传因素]
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 1982 May;9(5):808-14.
4
Comparison of some risk factors between non-familial and familial breast cancer females in Jordan.约旦非家族性和家族性乳腺癌女性患者部分风险因素的比较。
Saudi Med J. 2004 Feb;25(2):168-71.
5
Breast cancer in the elderly: histological, hormonal and surgical characteristics.老年乳腺癌:组织学、激素及手术特征
Breast. 2007 Feb;16(1):60-7. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2006.05.007.
6
The familial risk of breast cancer in women with endometriosis from Yale series.来自耶鲁系列研究的子宫内膜异位症女性患乳腺癌的家族风险。
Surg Oncol. 2008 Dec;17(4):289-93. doi: 10.1016/j.suronc.2008.01.002. Epub 2008 May 5.
7
Role and impact of menstrual and reproductive factors on breast cancer risk in Japan.月经和生殖因素对日本乳腺癌风险的作用及影响
Eur J Cancer Prev. 2007 Apr;16(2):116-23. doi: 10.1097/01.cej.0000228410.14095.2d.
8
Evidence for a programming effect of early menarche on the rise of breast cancer incidence in Hong Kong.初潮过早对香港乳腺癌发病率上升存在编程效应的证据。
Cancer Detect Prev. 2008;32(2):156-61. doi: 10.1016/j.cdp.2008.05.004. Epub 2008 Jul 16.
9
Hereditary breast cancer in Finnish women.芬兰女性的遗传性乳腺癌
Eur J Surg. 1995 Nov;161(11):805-9.
10
[Early menarche as a risk factor of breast cancer].[初潮早作为乳腺癌的一个风险因素]
Ginecol Obstet Mex. 2006 Nov;74(11):568-72.

引用本文的文献

1
The potential role of somatostatin analogues in breast cancer treatment.生长抑素类似物在乳腺癌治疗中的潜在作用。
Yale J Biol Med. 1997 Sep-Dec;70(5-6):535-9.
2
A clinicopathological analysis of breast cancer in patients with a family history.有家族病史的乳腺癌患者的临床病理分析
Surg Today. 1993;23(10):849-54. doi: 10.1007/BF00311360.
3
Second primary cancer following adjuvant chemotherapy, radiotherapy and endocrine therapy for breast cancer: a nationwide survey on 47,005 Japanese patients who underwent mastectomy from 1963-1982.
乳腺癌辅助化疗、放疗和内分泌治疗后的第二原发性癌症:对1963年至1982年期间接受乳房切除术的47,005名日本患者的全国性调查。
Jpn J Surg. 1986 Jul;16(4):262-71. doi: 10.1007/BF02470935.