Glezen W P
Rev Infect Dis. 1980 May-Jun;2(3):408-20. doi: 10.1093/clinids/2.3.408.
The development of effective prophylaxis against influenza virus infections presents a special challenge. Stimulation of a protective response apparently requires more than one exposure to the virus. The virus may then change its surface antigens to render ineffective previously acquired immunity. Ideally, artificial prophylaxis should stimulate better protection than does natural infection and should anticipate antigenic change. Children experience the highest morbidity, accompanied by considerable risk, during influenza epidemics. At the same time, children in school and day care are the most important disseminators of virus in the community. Consideration should be given to providing protection for all children against influenza when effective methods and strategies have been found. Such prophylaxis would decrease not only morbidity and serious disease in children but also the risk of exposure of high-risk adult patients.
开发有效的流感病毒感染预防措施面临着特殊挑战。激发保护性反应显然需要不止一次接触病毒。然后病毒可能会改变其表面抗原,使先前获得的免疫力失效。理想情况下,人工预防应比自然感染刺激更好的保护,并应预测抗原变化。在流感流行期间,儿童发病率最高,且伴有相当大的风险。与此同时,学校和日托机构中的儿童是社区中最重要的病毒传播者。当找到有效的方法和策略时,应考虑为所有儿童提供流感防护。这种预防措施不仅会降低儿童的发病率和严重疾病,还会降低高危成年患者的接触风险。