Sansonetti P, Lafont J P, Jaffé-Brachet A, Guillot J F, Chaslus-Dancla E
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1980 Mar;17(3):327-33. doi: 10.1128/AAC.17.3.327.
Conjugative transfer of R plasmids R64 and R64drd-11 has been compared in vitro and in vivo without selective pressure by antibiotics in a simplified experimental system; the ecosystem was the bowel of germfree chickens, with the host bacteria almost isogenic, and the plasmids differing only in their conjugative transfer frequency. The spread of repressed and derepressed (drd) R plasmids in recipient bacterial populations was very extensive. The repressed phenotype had only a transient effect during the first 4 h. The level of implantation of the donor bacterial population seems to be of minor importance. Only with a poor recipient (con strain) could the spread of R plasmids be reduced and a steady state with a predominantly sensitive bacterial population be established. It is suggested that this steady state results from an equilibrium between the frequencies of R plasmid transfer and loss.
R质粒R64和R64drd - 11的接合转移已在体外和体内进行比较,该简化实验系统中不存在抗生素选择压力;生态系统为无菌鸡的肠道,宿主细菌几乎是同基因的,质粒仅在接合转移频率上有所不同。受抑制和去抑制(drd)R质粒在受体细菌群体中的传播非常广泛。受抑制表型在最初4小时内仅有短暂影响。供体细菌群体的植入水平似乎不太重要。只有在受体较差(con菌株)的情况下,R质粒的传播才会减少,并建立起以主要为敏感细菌群体的稳定状态。有人认为,这种稳定状态是由R质粒转移频率和丢失频率之间的平衡导致的。