• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

A modified isolation technique for Chlamydia psittaci in L-cells treated with cycloheximide and glucocorticoid.

作者信息

Rønsholt L

出版信息

Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand B. 1981 Feb;89(1):13-23.

PMID:7020334
Abstract

Various auxiliary treatments of L-cells employed for the isolation and cultivation of C. psittaci were investigated in order to develop an improved method for the detection of the agent, in addition to the aid obtained by centrifugation and cycloheximide treatment. Glucocorticoid treatment increased the observed number of inclusions considerably through a preservative effect on host cells and enhanced an spontaneous re-infection. Besides, the hormone made the scanning of cell culture for inclusions more convenient through an altered cell morphology. This method was tested with two extreme species types that differed as regards cytopathogenicity and growth rate. The length of the cultivation period was of great importance for the diagnostic result. Especially the cytopathogenic agent-type influenced the optimal time of cell culture fixation, which was situated around 48 or 88 hours post infection (h p.i.). Owing to the cytotoxicity of field samples (milk secretion), the cell culture technique (48 h p.i.) was less sensitive compared to the conventional isolation method in embryonated eggs. However, a different sampling technique improved the result, and simultaneous use of the secondary multiplication cycle of chlamydia (88 h p.i.) makes the less cumbersome cell culture technic recommendable.

摘要

相似文献

1
A modified isolation technique for Chlamydia psittaci in L-cells treated with cycloheximide and glucocorticoid.
Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand B. 1981 Feb;89(1):13-23.
2
Infectivity of Chlamydia psittaci of bovine and ovine origins for cultured cells.
Am J Vet Res. 1982 Nov;43(11):1897-902.
3
Chlamydia psittaci: growth characteristics and enumeration of serotypes 1 and 2 in cultured cells.
J Infect Dis. 1979 Dec;140(6):959-67. doi: 10.1093/infdis/140.6.959.
4
Potential subtypes of Chlamydia psittaci based on effects of cortisone with cytochalasin B or cycloheximide.基于可的松与细胞松弛素B或放线菌酮的作用对鹦鹉热衣原体潜在亚型的研究
Can J Vet Res. 1986 Jan;50(1):111-4.
5
[Intestinal Chlamydia psittaci infection of cattle: frequency and technical aspects of the cultural detection of the agent].[牛的肠道鹦鹉热衣原体感染:病原体培养检测的频率及技术要点]
Dtsch Tierarztl Wochenschr. 1993 May;100(5):195-8.
6
[Plaque assay for Chlamydia psittaci in tissue samples (author's transl)].组织样本中鹦鹉热衣原体的空斑试验(作者译)
Ann Microbiol (Paris). 1977 Jul;128B(1):81-5.
7
Detection of Chlamydia psittaci in enteric subclinical infections in adult sheep, through cell culture isolation.通过细胞培养分离法检测成年绵羊肠道亚临床感染中的鹦鹉热衣原体。
Rev Latinoam Microbiol. 1996 Jan-Mar;38(1):17-23.
8
Infectivity of penicillin-induced Chlamydia psittaci forms for cell cultures from the chorioallantoic membrane of chick embryos.青霉素诱导的鹦鹉热衣原体形态对鸡胚尿囊膜细胞培养物的感染性。
Zentralbl Bakteriol A. 1980 Feb;246(1):119-27.
9
Biotyping of Chlamydia psittaci based on inclusion morphology and response to diethylaminoethyl-dextran and cycloheximide.基于包涵体形态以及对二乙氨基乙基葡聚糖和放线菌酮的反应对鹦鹉热衣原体进行生物分型。
Infect Immun. 1979 Apr;24(1):224-32. doi: 10.1128/iai.24.1.224-232.1979.
10
[Effects of DEAE-dextran, centrifugation, cycloheximide and their combination on infection and growth of Chlamydia psittaci bird isolates].[二乙氨基乙基葡聚糖、离心、放线菌酮及其组合对鹦鹉衣原体鸟类分离株感染和生长的影响]
Kansenshogaku Zasshi. 1990 Jan;64(1):87-95. doi: 10.11150/kansenshogakuzasshi1970.64.87.

引用本文的文献

1
Bovine mastitis induced by a common intestinal Chlamydia psittaci strain. A pathogenetic and serological investigation.由常见肠道鹦鹉热衣原体菌株引起的牛乳腺炎。病原学和血清学调查。
Acta Vet Scand. 1981;22(1):9-22. doi: 10.1186/BF03547201.