Taylor H R, Greene B M
Br J Ophthalmol. 1981 Jul;65(7):494-502. doi: 10.1136/bjo.65.7.494.
Twenty men with moderate infection of Onchocerca volvulus were studied in a double-masked, controlled clinical trial to compare the safety and efficacy of oral diethylcarbamazine (DEC) with topical DEC lotion. Visual acuity and colour vision did not alter during the 6 months of observation, although 2 patients receiving DEC lotion and 3 patients receiving oral DEC developed either visual field constriction or optic atrophy. Fluffy corneal opacities were common in both groups. Intraocular microfilariae also appeared in both groups but to a greater extent in those receiving DEC lotion. New chorioretinal changes developed in 4 men receiving lotion and in only 1 receiving tablets. It is concluded that DEC lotion offers no advantage over tablets in the treatment of ocular onchocerciasis and in fact may be associated with more ocular complications than the conventional oral treatment.
在一项双盲对照临床试验中,对20名中度盘尾丝虫感染患者进行了研究,以比较口服乙胺嗪(DEC)与外用DEC洗剂的安全性和疗效。在6个月的观察期内,视力和色觉没有改变,尽管2名接受DEC洗剂治疗的患者和3名接受口服DEC治疗的患者出现了视野缩小或视神经萎缩。两组中均常见绒毛状角膜混浊。两组均出现眼内微丝蚴,但接受DEC洗剂治疗的患者中更为多见。4名接受洗剂治疗的男性出现了新的脉络膜视网膜改变,而接受片剂治疗的仅1名。得出的结论是,在治疗眼部盘尾丝虫病方面,DEC洗剂并不比片剂更具优势,事实上,与传统口服治疗相比,它可能会导致更多的眼部并发症。