Suppr超能文献

抗菌去除装置。微生物学与临床评估。

The antimicrobial removal device. A microbiological and clinical evaluation.

作者信息

Wright A J, Thompson R L, McLimans C A, Wilson W R, Washington J A

出版信息

Am J Clin Pathol. 1982 Aug;78(2):173-7. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/78.2.173.

Abstract

A parallel study of blood cultured conventionally and following processing in an Antimicrobial Removal Device (ARD) was conducted with patients suspected of being clinically bacteremic. Cultures yielded 205 isolates from 87 clinically bacteremic patients, of whom 28 were receiving antibiotics at the time their cultures were performed. Overall, ARD processing neither increased the isolation rate nor decreased the time interval required for detection of organisms compared with conventional processing. ARD processing was the only means of isolation of organisms from only seven of the 87 patients and three of the 28 receiving antibiotics, whereas conventional processing accounted for the only means of isolation of organisms from 17 of the 87 patients and nine of the 28 receiving antibiotics. ARD processing demonstrated no advantages over conventional processing of blood cultures.

摘要

对疑似临床菌血症的患者进行了一项平行研究,比较了常规血液培养和在抗菌去除装置(ARD)中处理后的情况。从87例临床菌血症患者的培养物中分离出205株菌株,其中28例在进行培养时正在接受抗生素治疗。总体而言,与传统处理相比,ARD处理既没有提高分离率,也没有缩短检测到微生物所需的时间间隔。ARD处理是从87例患者中的仅7例以及接受抗生素治疗的28例中的3例中分离出微生物的唯一方法,而传统处理是从87例患者中的17例以及接受抗生素治疗的28例中的9例中分离出微生物的唯一方法。ARD处理在血培养的传统处理方面没有显示出优势。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验