• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

抗生素去除装置的评估

Evaluation of the Antibiotic Removal Device.

作者信息

Appleman M D, Swinney R S, Heseltine P N

出版信息

J Clin Microbiol. 1982 Feb;15(2):278-81. doi: 10.1128/jcm.15.2.278-281.1982.

DOI:10.1128/jcm.15.2.278-281.1982
PMID:7068823
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC272076/
Abstract

A new system called an Antibiotic Removal Device (ARD), used for the removal of residual antibiotics in blood specimens, was studied in 300 patients diagnosed as clinically septic despite antimicrobial therapy. Blood specimens from these patients were processed with and without the ARD into aerobic and anaerobic media. There were 53 patients who had one or more positive blood culture bottles, for a total of 109 positive blood culture bottles. Of these 109 bottles, 33.9% were positive with ARD-processed blood in aerobic media, 24.8% with ARD-processed blood in anaerobic media, 22.9% with conventionally processed blood in aerobic media, and 18.3% with conventionally processed specimens in anaerobic media. After 6 h of incubation, 14 bottles with blood processed by the ARD and 9 bottles processed conventionally were positive; after 24 h, 48 bottles with blood processed by the ARD and 31 bottles processed conventionally were positive. The same organisms were isolated from both ARD- and conventionally processed blood, with four exceptions. The ARD system, when compared with a conventional system of blood specimen processing, significantly increased the detection of bacteremia and decreased the time required for its detection in patients clinically septic despite ongoing antimicrobial therapy.

摘要

一种名为抗生素去除装置(ARD)的新系统,用于去除血液标本中的残留抗生素,该系统在300名尽管接受了抗菌治疗但临床诊断为败血症的患者中进行了研究。对这些患者的血液标本分别使用ARD和不使用ARD进行处理,并接种到需氧和厌氧培养基中。有53名患者的一个或多个血培养瓶呈阳性,总共109个血培养瓶阳性。在这109个培养瓶中,需氧培养基中经ARD处理的血液培养瓶阳性率为33.9%,厌氧培养基中经ARD处理的血液培养瓶阳性率为24.8%,需氧培养基中传统处理的血液培养瓶阳性率为22.9%,厌氧培养基中传统处理的标本阳性率为18.3%。培养6小时后,经ARD处理的血液有14个培养瓶阳性,传统处理的有9个培养瓶阳性;培养24小时后,经ARD处理的血液有48个培养瓶阳性,传统处理的有31个培养瓶阳性。除了4个例外情况,从经ARD处理和传统处理的血液中分离出的是相同的微生物。与传统的血液标本处理系统相比,ARD系统显著提高了菌血症的检测率,并且缩短了在尽管正在进行抗菌治疗但临床败血症患者中检测菌血症所需的时间。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of the Antibiotic Removal Device.抗生素去除装置的评估
J Clin Microbiol. 1982 Feb;15(2):278-81. doi: 10.1128/jcm.15.2.278-281.1982.
2
Evaluation of new blood culture processing systems.新型血培养处理系统的评估
J Clin Microbiol. 1984 Sep;20(3):351-6. doi: 10.1128/jcm.20.3.351-356.1984.
3
Detection of bacteremia in patients receiving antimicrobial therapy: an evaluation of the antimicrobial removal device and 16B medium.接受抗菌治疗患者的菌血症检测:抗菌清除装置和16B培养基的评估
J Clin Microbiol. 1983 Jul;18(1):43-8. doi: 10.1128/jcm.18.1.43-48.1983.
4
Cost effectiveness of the antibiotic removal device for processing blood cultures.用于处理血培养的抗生素去除装置的成本效益。
J Natl Med Assoc. 1986 Sep;78(9):857-61.
5
The antimicrobial removal device. A microbiological and clinical evaluation.抗菌去除装置。微生物学与临床评估。
Am J Clin Pathol. 1982 Aug;78(2):173-7. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/78.2.173.
6
Is the antimicrobial removal device a cost-effective addition to conventional blood cultures?抗菌去除装置作为传统血培养的补充是否具有成本效益?
J Clin Pathol. 1984 Mar;37(3):348-51. doi: 10.1136/jcp.37.3.348.
7
Use of an antimicrobial removal device in endophthalmitis cultures.抗菌去除装置在眼内炎培养物中的应用。
Retina. 1998;18(2):169-73. doi: 10.1097/00006982-199818020-00013.
8
Evaluation of an Antimicrobial Removal Device (ARD) for detection of septicemia.
Scand J Infect Dis. 1986;18(5):461-3. doi: 10.3109/00365548609032365.
9
Improved recovery of microorganisms from patients receiving antibiotics with the antimicrobial removal device.使用抗菌去除装置提高接受抗生素治疗患者体内微生物的回收率。
Am J Clin Pathol. 1983 Nov;80(5):692-6. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/80.5.692.
10
Controlled comparative evaluation of BacT/Alert FAN and ESP 80A aerobic media as means for detecting bacteremia and fungemia.BacT/Alert FAN和ESP 80A需氧培养基作为检测菌血症和真菌血症手段的对照比较评估
J Clin Microbiol. 1998 Sep;36(9):2686-9. doi: 10.1128/JCM.36.9.2686-2689.1998.

引用本文的文献

1
Best Practices of Blood Cultures in Low- and Middle-Income Countries.低收入和中等收入国家血培养的最佳实践
Front Med (Lausanne). 2019 Jun 18;6:131. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2019.00131. eCollection 2019.
2
Comparison of BACTEC PLUS blood culture media to BacT/Alert FA blood culture media for detection of bacterial pathogens in samples containing therapeutic levels of antibiotics.比较BACTEC PLUS血培养培养基与BacT/Alert FA血培养培养基在含有治疗水平抗生素的样本中检测细菌病原体的能力。
J Clin Microbiol. 2007 Mar;45(3):816-21. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02064-06. Epub 2006 Dec 13.
3
Clinical importance of increased sensitivity of BacT/Alert FAN aerobic and anaerobic blood culture bottles.BacT/Alert FAN需氧和厌氧血培养瓶敏感性增加的临床意义
J Clin Microbiol. 1996 Sep;34(9):2180-4. doi: 10.1128/jcm.34.9.2180-2184.1996.
4
Controlled evaluation of BacT/Alert standard aerobic and FAN aerobic blood culture bottles for detection of bacteremia and fungemia.BacT/Alert标准需氧培养瓶与FAN需氧血培养瓶检测菌血症和真菌血症的对照评估
J Clin Microbiol. 1995 Apr;33(4):978-81. doi: 10.1128/jcm.33.4.978-981.1995.
5
Controlled evaluation of BacT/alert standard anaerobic and FAN anaerobic blood culture bottles for the detection of bacteremia and fungemia.BacT/alert标准厌氧血培养瓶和FAN厌氧血培养瓶用于检测菌血症和真菌血症的对照评估。
J Clin Microbiol. 1995 Sep;33(9):2265-70. doi: 10.1128/jcm.33.9.2265-2270.1995.
6
In vitro evaluation of the BACTEC resin-containing blood culture bottle.含BACTEC树脂血培养瓶的体外评估
J Clin Microbiol. 1983 Jun;17(6):1120-6. doi: 10.1128/jcm.17.6.1120-1126.1983.
7
Enhanced detection of bacteremia with a new BACTEC resin blood culture medium.采用新型BACTEC树脂血培养培养基增强菌血症检测
J Clin Microbiol. 1983 Jan;17(1):48-51. doi: 10.1128/jcm.17.1.48-51.1983.
8
Evaluation of the BACTEC antimicrobial removal system for detection of bacteremia.用于检测菌血症的BACTEC抗菌去除系统的评估
J Clin Microbiol. 1983 Sep;18(3):449-51. doi: 10.1128/jcm.18.3.449-451.1983.
9
Is the antimicrobial removal device a cost-effective addition to conventional blood cultures?抗菌去除装置作为传统血培养的补充是否具有成本效益?
J Clin Pathol. 1984 Mar;37(3):348-51. doi: 10.1136/jcp.37.3.348.
10
Routine use of BACTEC 16B bottles to remove antibacterial and antitumor agents from blood cultures of cancer patients.常规使用BACTEC 16B瓶从癌症患者的血培养物中去除抗菌和抗肿瘤药物。
J Clin Microbiol. 1983 Oct;18(4):759-64. doi: 10.1128/jcm.18.4.759-764.1983.

本文引用的文献

1
Rapid isolation of bacteria from septicemic patients by use of an antimicrobial agent removal device.使用抗菌剂去除装置从败血症患者中快速分离细菌。
J Clin Microbiol. 1980 May;11(5):462-4. doi: 10.1128/jcm.11.5.462-464.1980.
2
Use of antibiotics. A brief exposition of the problem and some tentative solutions.抗生素的使用。问题简述及一些初步解决方案。
Ann Intern Med. 1973 Oct;79(4):555-60. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-79-4-555.
3
Practical aerobic membrane filtration blood culture technique: clinical blood culture trial.实用需氧膜过滤血培养技术:临床血培养试验
J Clin Microbiol. 1975 Jan;1(1):37-43. doi: 10.1128/jcm.1.1.37-43.1975.