• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

BacT/alert标准厌氧血培养瓶和FAN厌氧血培养瓶用于检测菌血症和真菌血症的对照评估。

Controlled evaluation of BacT/alert standard anaerobic and FAN anaerobic blood culture bottles for the detection of bacteremia and fungemia.

作者信息

Wilson M L, Weinstein M P, Mirrett S, Reimer L G, Feldman R J, Chuard C R, Reller L B

机构信息

Department of Pathology and Laboratory Service, Denver Health & Hospitals, Colorado 80204, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Microbiol. 1995 Sep;33(9):2265-70. doi: 10.1128/jcm.33.9.2265-2270.1995.

DOI:10.1128/jcm.33.9.2265-2270.1995
PMID:7494013
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC228392/
Abstract

FAN medium was formulated to improve microbial recovery, particularly for fastidious microorganisms and for microorganisms causing sepsis in patients receiving antimicrobial therapy. In a controlled clinical evaluation performed at four university-affiliated hospitals, FAN anaerobic bottles were compared with standard anaerobic bottles for yield, speed of detection of microbial growth, and detection of septic episodes. A total of 10,431 blood culture sets were received; both anaerobic bottles of 7,694 blood culture sets were adequately filled with blood. Altogether, 925 isolates were recovered: 557 that were the cause of sepsis, 99 that were indeterminate as the cause of sepsis, and 269 contaminants. More Staphylococcus aureus (P < 0.001), coagulase-negative staphylococci (P < 0.001), Escherichia coli (P < 0.02), and all microorganisms combined (P < 0.005) were recovered from FAN bottles; more nonfermentative gram-negative bacilli (P < 0.05), Torulopsis glabrata (P < 0.001), and other yeasts (P < 0.01) were recovered from standard bottles. Growth of S. aureus (P < 0.001), coagulase-negative staphylococci (P < 0.001), Enterococcus faecalis (P < 0.025), streptococci other than Streptococcus pneumoniae (P < 0.01), and all microorganisms combined (P < 0.001) was detected earlier in standard bottles; growth of more isolates of E. coli (P < 0.05) and anaerobic bacteria (P < 0.01) was detected earlier in FAN bottles. The mean times to detection were 14.2 and 16.1 h for standard and FAN bottles, respectively. More septic episodes caused by S. aureus (P < 0.001), coagulase-negative staphylococci (P < 0.005), members of the family Enterobacteriaceae (P < 0.02), and all microorganisms combined (P < 0.02) were detected in FAN bottles; more septic episodes caused by nonfermentative gram-negative bacilli (P < 0.025) and yeasts (P < 0.005) were detected in standard bottles. In summary, more isolates (except for strict aerobes) were recovered from FAN bottles than from standard anaerobic bottles. Similarly, significant more septic episodes (except for those caused by strict aerobes) were detected with FAN bottles than with standard anaerobic bottles. With the exception of E. coli and anaerobic bacteria, growth of more isolates was detected earlier in standard anaerobic bottles.

摘要

FAN培养基的配方旨在提高微生物回收率,特别是对于苛求菌以及接受抗菌治疗患者中引起败血症的微生物。在四家大学附属医院进行的一项对照临床评估中,对FAN厌氧瓶与标准厌氧瓶在微生物生长产量、检测速度以及败血症发作检测方面进行了比较。共收到10431套血培养标本;7694套血培养标本的两个厌氧瓶均充分装满血液。总共分离出925株菌株:557株为败血症病因,99株败血症病因不明,269株为污染物。从FAN瓶中分离出的金黄色葡萄球菌(P<0.001)、凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌(P<0.001)、大肠杆菌(P<0.02)以及所有微生物合计(P<0.005)更多;从标准瓶中分离出的非发酵革兰阴性杆菌(P<0.05)、光滑念珠菌(P<0.001)和其他酵母菌(P<0.01)更多。金黄色葡萄球菌(P<0.001)、凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌(P<0.001)、粪肠球菌(P<0.025)、除肺炎链球菌外的链球菌(P<0.01)以及所有微生物合计(P<0.001)在标准瓶中更早被检测到生长;更多大肠杆菌菌株(P<0.05)和厌氧菌(P<0.01)在FAN瓶中更早被检测到生长。标准瓶和FAN瓶的平均检测时间分别为 14.2小时和16.1小时。在FAN瓶中检测到更多由金黄色葡萄球菌(P<0.001)、凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌(P<0.005)、肠杆菌科成员(P<0.02)以及所有微生物合计(P<0.02)引起的败血症发作;在标准瓶中检测到更多由非发酵革兰阴性杆菌(P<0.025)和酵母菌(P<0.005)引起的败血症发作。总之,从FAN瓶中回收的分离株(严格需氧菌除外)比从标准厌氧瓶中更多。同样,与标准厌氧瓶相比,FAN瓶检测到的败血症发作显著更多(严格需氧菌引起的发作除外)。除大肠杆菌和厌氧菌外,更多分离株在标准厌氧瓶中更早被检测到生长。

相似文献

1
Controlled evaluation of BacT/alert standard anaerobic and FAN anaerobic blood culture bottles for the detection of bacteremia and fungemia.BacT/alert标准厌氧血培养瓶和FAN厌氧血培养瓶用于检测菌血症和真菌血症的对照评估。
J Clin Microbiol. 1995 Sep;33(9):2265-70. doi: 10.1128/jcm.33.9.2265-2270.1995.
2
Controlled clinical comparison of the BacT/ALERT FN and the standard anaerobic SN blood culture medium.BacT/ALERT FN与标准厌氧SN血培养培养基的对照临床比较。
J Clin Microbiol. 2004 Oct;42(10):4581-5. doi: 10.1128/JCM.42.10.4581-4585.2004.
3
Controlled evaluation of BacT/Alert standard aerobic and FAN aerobic blood culture bottles for detection of bacteremia and fungemia.BacT/Alert标准需氧培养瓶与FAN需氧血培养瓶检测菌血症和真菌血症的对照评估
J Clin Microbiol. 1995 Apr;33(4):978-81. doi: 10.1128/jcm.33.4.978-981.1995.
4
Controlled comparison of original vented aerobic fan medium with new nonvented BacT/ALERT FA medium for culturing blood.用于血液培养的原装透气需氧扇形培养基与新型非透气BacT/ALERT FA培养基的对照比较。
J Clin Microbiol. 2001 Jun;39(6):2098-101. doi: 10.1128/JCM.39.6.2098-2101.2001.
5
Controlled clinical comparison of BACTEC plus anaerobic/F to standard anaerobic/F as the anaerobic companion bottle to plus aerobic/F medium for culturing blood from adults.BACTEC plus厌氧/F与标准厌氧/F作为与plus需氧/F培养基配套用于培养成人血液的厌氧瓶的对照临床比较。
J Clin Microbiol. 2001 Mar;39(3):983-9. doi: 10.1128/JCM.39.3.983-989.2001.
6
Controlled comparative evaluation of BacT/Alert FAN and ESP 80A aerobic media as means for detecting bacteremia and fungemia.BacT/Alert FAN和ESP 80A需氧培养基作为检测菌血症和真菌血症手段的对照比较评估
J Clin Microbiol. 1998 Sep;36(9):2686-9. doi: 10.1128/JCM.36.9.2686-2689.1998.
7
Controlled comparison of the BacT/Alert and BACTEC 660/730 nonradiometric blood culture systems.BacT/Alert与BACTEC 660/730非放射性血培养系统的对照比较
J Clin Microbiol. 1992 Feb;30(2):323-9. doi: 10.1128/jcm.30.2.323-329.1992.
8
Use of the BacT/Alert blood culture system for culture of sterile body fluids other than blood.使用BacT/Alert血培养系统对除血液外的无菌体液进行培养。
J Clin Microbiol. 1998 Nov;36(11):3273-7. doi: 10.1128/JCM.36.11.3273-3277.1998.
9
Controlled comparison of the BACTEC high-blood-volume fungal medium, BACTEC Plus 26 aerobic blood culture bottle, and 10-milliliter isolator blood culture system for detection of fungemia and bacteremia.BACTEC高血容量真菌培养基、BACTEC Plus 26需氧血培养瓶和10毫升隔离器血培养系统检测真菌血症和菌血症的对照比较
J Clin Microbiol. 1993 Apr;31(4):865-71. doi: 10.1128/jcm.31.4.865-871.1993.
10
Controlled evaluation of 5 versus 10 milliliters of blood cultured in aerobic BacT/Alert blood culture bottles.在需氧BacT/Alert血培养瓶中培养5毫升与10毫升血液的对照评估。
J Clin Microbiol. 1994 Sep;32(9):2103-6. doi: 10.1128/jcm.32.9.2103-2106.1994.

引用本文的文献

1
A simple, low-cost, and highly efficient protocol for rapid isolation of pathogenic bacteria from human blood.一种用于从人血液中快速分离病原菌的简单、低成本且高效的方案。
Front Microbiol. 2025 Aug 13;16:1637776. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2025.1637776. eCollection 2025.
2
Utility of anaerobic bottles for the diagnosis of bloodstream infections.厌氧瓶在血流感染诊断中的应用。
BMC Infect Dis. 2020 Feb 14;20(1):142. doi: 10.1186/s12879-020-4854-x.
3
Practical Guidance for Clinical Microbiology Laboratories: A Comprehensive Update on the Problem of Blood Culture Contamination and a Discussion of Methods for Addressing the Problem.临床微生物学实验室实用指南:血液培养污染问题的全面更新及解决方法讨论。
Clin Microbiol Rev. 2019 Oct 30;33(1). doi: 10.1128/CMR.00009-19. Print 2019 Dec 18.
4
Prevalence of microbial contamination in donor corneas.供体角膜中微生物污染的发生率。
Taiwan J Ophthalmol. 2019 Sep 12;9(3):179-184. doi: 10.4103/tjo.tjo_60_18. eCollection 2019 Jul-Sep.
5
Best Practices of Blood Cultures in Low- and Middle-Income Countries.低收入和中等收入国家血培养的最佳实践
Front Med (Lausanne). 2019 Jun 18;6:131. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2019.00131. eCollection 2019.
6
Performance Survey and Comparison Between Rapid Sterility Testing Method and Pharmacopoeia Sterility Test.快速无菌检测方法与药典无菌检测的性能调查及比较
J Pharm Innov. 2018;13(1):27-35. doi: 10.1007/s12247-017-9303-z. Epub 2017 Dec 5.
7
How to Optimize the Use of Blood Cultures for the Diagnosis of Bloodstream Infections? A State-of-the Art.如何优化血培养在血流感染诊断中的应用?最新进展
Front Microbiol. 2016 May 12;7:697. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.00697. eCollection 2016.
8
Performance of two resin-containing blood culture media in detection of bloodstream infections and in direct matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) broth assays for isolate identification: clinical comparison of the BacT/Alert Plus and Bactec Plus systems.两种含树脂血培养培养基在检测血流感染及直接基质辅助激光解吸电离飞行时间质谱(MALDI-TOF MS)肉汤检测法用于分离株鉴定中的性能:BacT/Alert Plus和Bactec Plus系统的临床比较
J Clin Microbiol. 2014 Oct;52(10):3558-67. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01171-14. Epub 2014 Jul 16.
9
Controlled clinical comparison of BacT/alert FA plus and FN plus blood culture media with BacT/alert FA and FN blood culture media.BacT/alert FA plus和FN plus血培养培养基与BacT/alert FA和FN血培养培养基的对照临床比较。
J Clin Microbiol. 2014 Mar;52(3):839-43. doi: 10.1128/JCM.03063-13. Epub 2013 Dec 26.
10
Development of conventional and real-time multiplex PCR assays for the detection of nosocomial pathogens.开发传统和实时多重 PCR 检测方法用于检测医院病原体。
Braz J Microbiol. 2011 Apr;42(2):448-58. doi: 10.1590/S1517-83822011000200006. Epub 2011 Jun 1.

本文引用的文献

1
Recovery of clinically important microorganisms from the BacT/Alert blood culture system does not require testing for seven days.从BacT/Alert血培养系统中培养出具有临床重要意义的微生物无需进行七天的检测。
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1993 Jan;16(1):31-4. doi: 10.1016/0732-8893(93)90127-s.
2
Controlled evaluation of 5 versus 10 milliliters of blood cultured in aerobic BacT/Alert blood culture bottles.在需氧BacT/Alert血培养瓶中培养5毫升与10毫升血液的对照评估。
J Clin Microbiol. 1994 Sep;32(9):2103-6. doi: 10.1128/jcm.32.9.2103-2106.1994.
3
Controlled evaluation of BacT/Alert standard aerobic and FAN aerobic blood culture bottles for detection of bacteremia and fungemia.BacT/Alert标准需氧培养瓶与FAN需氧血培养瓶检测菌血症和真菌血症的对照评估
J Clin Microbiol. 1995 Apr;33(4):978-81. doi: 10.1128/jcm.33.4.978-981.1995.
4
Detection of yeasts and filamentous fungi in blood cultures during a 10-year period (1972 to 1981).10年期间(1972年至1981年)血培养中酵母和丝状真菌的检测
J Clin Microbiol. 1982 Nov;16(5):968-70. doi: 10.1128/jcm.16.5.968-970.1982.
5
Evaluation of the Antibiotic Removal Device.抗生素去除装置的评估
J Clin Microbiol. 1982 Feb;15(2):278-81. doi: 10.1128/jcm.15.2.278-281.1982.
6
The antimicrobial removal device. A microbiological and clinical evaluation.抗菌去除装置。微生物学与临床评估。
Am J Clin Pathol. 1982 Aug;78(2):173-7. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/78.2.173.
7
The clinical significance of positive blood cultures: a comprehensive analysis of 500 episodes of bacteremia and fungemia in adults. I. Laboratory and epidemiologic observations.血培养阳性的临床意义:对500例成人菌血症和真菌血症病例的综合分析。I. 实验室及流行病学观察
Rev Infect Dis. 1983 Jan-Feb;5(1):35-53. doi: 10.1093/clinids/5.1.35.
8
Enhanced detection of bacteremia with a new BACTEC resin blood culture medium.采用新型BACTEC树脂血培养培养基增强菌血症检测
J Clin Microbiol. 1983 Jan;17(1):48-51. doi: 10.1128/jcm.17.1.48-51.1983.
9
Evaluation of the antimicrobial removal device when used with the BACTEC blood culture system.抗菌去除装置与BACTEC血培养系统联合使用时的评估。
Am J Clin Pathol. 1982 Dec;78(6):853-6. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/78.6.853.
10
Routine use of BACTEC 16B bottles to remove antibacterial and antitumor agents from blood cultures of cancer patients.常规使用BACTEC 16B瓶从癌症患者的血培养物中去除抗菌和抗肿瘤药物。
J Clin Microbiol. 1983 Oct;18(4):759-64. doi: 10.1128/jcm.18.4.759-764.1983.