Thornton A R, Raffin M J
J Speech Hear Res. 1978 Sep;21(3):507-18. doi: 10.1044/jshr.2103.507.
Many studies have reported variability data for tests of speech discrimination, and the disparate results of these studies have not been given a simple explanation. Arguments over the relative merits of 25- vs 50-word tests have ignored the basic mathematical properties inherent in the use of percentage scores. The present study models performance on clinical tests of speech discrimination as a binomial variable. A binomial model was developed, and some of its characteristics were tested against data from 4120 scores obtained on the CID Auditory Test W-22. A table for determining significant deviations between scores was generated and compared to observed differences in half-list scores for the W-22 tests. Good agreement was found between predicted and observed values. Implications of the binomial characteristics of speech-discrimination scores are discussed.
许多研究报告了言语辨别测试的变异性数据,而这些研究结果的差异尚未得到简单的解释。关于25词测试与50词测试相对优点的争论忽略了使用百分比分数所固有的基本数学特性。本研究将言语辨别临床测试的表现建模为二项变量。开发了一个二项模型,并根据在CID听觉测试W - 22上获得的4120个分数的数据对其一些特征进行了测试。生成了一个用于确定分数之间显著偏差的表格,并将其与W - 22测试半列表分数的观察差异进行比较。预测值与观察值之间发现了良好的一致性。讨论了言语辨别分数的二项特征的含义。