Luce S C, Delquadri J, Hall R V
J Appl Behav Anal. 1980 Winter;13(4):583-94. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1980.13-583.
Two single-subject experiments were conducted in public school classrooms for severely emotionally disturbed children. Both experiments investigated the effects of a treatment requiring a child to exhibit a simple exercise task after a verbal or aggressive response, using reversal and multiple-baseline designs. The independent variable, contingent exercise, required standing up and sitting on the floor five to ten times contingent on an inappropriate behavior. It was found that contingent exercise was easy to carry out, and following it, the child quickly returned to the learning task that had been interrupted by the inappropriate behavior. The contingent exercise procedure required a minimum of prompting or manual guidance. Although contingent exercise was not topographically related to the inappropriate response, it decreased those responses dramatically. The results suggested that contingent exercise was not only more powerful than DRO but also could be administered independently. It was concluded that contingent exercise may constitute an alternative procedure that can be used by therapists confronted with severely abnormal behaviors. It would appear to be particularly relevant in settings where procedures such as timeout and painful consequences find restricted use. Finally, a number of guidelines have been proposed as a safeguard against the misuse of this mild but powerful procedure.
在公立学校针对严重情绪障碍儿童的教室中进行了两项单受试者实验。两项实验均采用反转设计和多基线设计,研究了一种要求儿童在言语或攻击性行为后进行简单练习任务的治疗方法的效果。自变量为依随练习,要求儿童在出现不适当行为后站立并在地板上坐起五到十次。结果发现,依随练习易于实施,实施后,儿童能迅速回到被不适当行为打断的学习任务中。依随练习程序最少需要提示或手动指导。尽管依随练习在形式上与不适当反应无关,但它能显著减少这些反应。结果表明,依随练习不仅比消退法更有效,而且可以独立实施。得出的结论是,依随练习可能构成一种替代程序,可供面对严重异常行为的治疗师使用。在诸如暂停和痛苦后果等程序使用受限的环境中,依随练习似乎特别适用。最后,提出了一些指导方针,以防止滥用这种温和但有效的程序。