Mertens H M, Mannebach H, Trieb G, Gleichmann U
Clin Cardiol. 1981 Jan;4(1):22-7. doi: 10.1002/clc.4960040106.
The effects of atrial pacing and dynamic exercise in the supine position on systolic time intervals (STI) were compared in 10 normals. In another group of 13 normals, the effect of exercise alone on STI was tested. A linear shortening of electromechanical systole (QS2) and left ventricular ejection time (LVET) with increasing heart rate was demonstrated with right atrial pacing and dynamic exercise in the frequency range between 60 and 140 beats/min. However, the shortening of LVET was significantly less (p less than 0.01) with exercise compared to pacing. This is explained by an increase in left ventricular stroke volume with exercise. The preejection period (PEP) was significantly (p less than 0.001) shortened with exercise, but there was no change with atrial pacing. Thus, changes in heart rate (HR) alone, without changes in the dynamic state of the heart, did not influence PEP. It is suggested that PEP at rest should not be corrected for heart rate. The supine exercise regression equations for correction of heart rate for LVET and PEP differ from both the resting and the upright exercise regression equations. With exercise a frequency correction of STI using regression equations should be abandoned. Instead, uncorrected STI at standard heart rates (e.g., 100, 110, and 130 beats/min) should be taken for comparison. Heart rate standardization should be employed using the formula: Formula (See Text).
对10名正常人比较了仰卧位时心房起搏和动态运动对收缩期时间间期(STI)的影响。在另一组13名正常人中,测试了单独运动对STI的影响。在60至140次/分钟的频率范围内,通过右心房起搏和动态运动证明,随着心率增加,机电收缩期(QS2)和左心室射血时间(LVET)呈线性缩短。然而,与起搏相比,运动时LVET的缩短明显较少(p<0.01)。这可以通过运动时左心室搏出量增加来解释。运动时射血前期(PEP)显著缩短(p<0.001),但心房起搏时无变化。因此,仅心率(HR)变化而心脏动态状态无变化时,不影响PEP。建议静息时的PEP不应进行心率校正。用于校正LVET和PEP心率的仰卧位运动回归方程与静息和直立位运动回归方程均不同。运动时,应放弃使用回归方程对STI进行频率校正。相反,应采用标准心率(如100、110和130次/分钟)下未校正的STI进行比较。应使用公式:公式(见正文)进行心率标准化。