Brodal P, Brodal A
J Comp Neurol. 1981 Sep 20;201(3):375-93. doi: 10.1002/cne.902010306.
Following injections of horseradish peroxidase (HRP) in various lobes and lobules of the macaque cerebellum the occurrence of retrogradely labeled cells in the inferior olive was mapped. Only cortical areas showing staining of the molecular layer were considered as sites of uptake of HRP. To facilitate comparisons between cases and presentation of findings, a diagram of the macaque inferior olive as imagined unfolded was constructed (Fig. 1). Attempts were made to compare the findings made with data on the olivocerebellar projection in the cat and the pattern of a longitudinal zonal subdivision of the cerebellum. In general there appears to be a remarkably close correspondence between the organization of the olivocerebellar projection in the monkey and the cat. The projection is precisely organized and appears to be purely crossed. Within the projections to some of the cerebellar cortical zones a topical pattern can be demonstrated. Olivary afferents to vermal lobules V, VII, and VIII are derived from the caudal half of the medial accessory olive, projecting to Voogd's zone A. The topical pattern resembles that in the cat (Fig. 8). after injections covering the lateral zone of the anterior lobe vermis (zone B), labeled cells are seen in the caudal part of the dorsal accessory olive. In some cases staining of the intermediate part of the anterior lobe and of the paramedian lobule is followed by labeling of cells in the rostral part of the dorsal accessory olive (zones C1 and C3) or in the rostral half of the medial accessory (zone C2). When the injected area covers lateral parts of the cerebellum, there is labeling in the principal olive (projecting to zones D1 and D2). Although not entirely decisive, the findings lend support to the view that the ventral lamella of the principal olive supplies zone D2, whereas the dorsal lamella supplies zone D1. The relatively sparse data in the literature on the afferents to the monkey olive are briefly considered. On may points the projections appear to be as in the cat. However, there is possibly a species difference between cat and monkey as concerns their receipt of afferents from the red nucleus.
在猕猴小脑的不同叶和小叶注射辣根过氧化物酶(HRP)后,绘制了下橄榄核中逆行标记细胞的分布图。只有分子层出现染色的皮质区域才被视为HRP摄取部位。为便于病例间比较和结果呈现,构建了一幅想象中展开的猕猴下橄榄核示意图(图1)。尝试将这些结果与猫的橄榄小脑投射数据以及小脑纵向带状细分模式进行比较。总体而言,猴子和猫的橄榄小脑投射组织之间似乎存在非常密切的对应关系。该投射组织精确,似乎完全交叉。在投射到某些小脑皮质区域内,可以显示出一种局部模式。蚓部小叶V、VII和VIII的橄榄传入纤维来自内侧副橄榄核的后半部,投射到Voogd的A区。这种局部模式与猫的相似(图8)。在前叶蚓部外侧区(B区)注射后,在背侧副橄榄核的尾部可见标记细胞。在某些情况下,前叶中间部分和旁正中小叶染色后,背侧副橄榄核的头部(C1和C3区)或内侧副橄榄核的前半部分(C2区)会出现细胞标记。当注射区域覆盖小脑外侧部分时,主橄榄核会有标记(投射到D1和D2区)。尽管这些结果并非完全决定性的,但它们支持了这样一种观点,即主橄榄核的腹侧薄片供应D2区,而背侧薄片供应D1区。文中简要考虑了关于猴子橄榄核传入纤维的文献中相对较少的数据。在许多方面,投射情况似乎与猫的相同。然而,在猫和猴子接受来自红核的传入纤维方面可能存在种属差异。