Marcell M M, Allen T W
J Genet Psychol. 1978 Dec;133(2d Half):171-82. doi: 10.1080/00221325.1978.10533375.
The sensory modality of a task and the modality of a retroactive interfering activity were systematically covaried in order to test Connolly and Jones' and Pick's translation models of intersensory functioning. Forty 10-year-old boys and girls were asked to recall distance and location cues of length under intrasensory and intersensory task conditions (visual and kinesthetic). Visual and kinesthetic interpolated activities were used in an attempt to provide modality specific interference with the recall of length under the various sensory task conditions. Results of the data analyses provided no support for the Connolly and Jones model of modality specific storage with translation. Rather, the findings of the study were interpreted as supportive of Pick's hypothesis which emphasizes the coding of stimulus information (regardless of modality of input) into a form specific to whatever modality is specialized for detection of the information.
为了检验康诺利和琼斯以及皮克的感官功能转换模型，系统地改变了一项任务的感觉模态和一项追溯干扰活动的模态。40名10岁的男孩和女孩被要求在感觉内和感觉间任务条件下（视觉和动觉）回忆长度的距离和位置线索。使用视觉和动觉插入活动，试图在各种感觉任务条件下对长度的回忆提供特定模态的干扰。数据分析结果不支持康诺利和琼斯的特定模态存储与转换模型。相反，该研究的结果被解释为支持皮克的假设，该假设强调将刺激信息（无论输入模态如何）编码为特定于专门用于检测该信息的任何模态的形式。
