Beardsmore C S, Helms P, Stocks J, Hatch D J, Silverman M
J Appl Physiol Respir Environ Exerc Physiol. 1980 Oct;49(4):735-42. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1980.49.4.735.
Esophageal balloons of three different wall thicknesses, two different lengths, and two different diameters were made to assess which type of balloon gave the most consistent and reliable measurements of dynamic compliance (CL) and pulmonary resistance (Rp). The balloons were subjected to in vitro testing to determine their pressure-volume characteristics and working range and then used in infants to compare in vivo results from one balloon to another. The optimal balloon was found to have a length of 35--50 mm, a diameter of 7.6 mm, and a wall thickness of 0.045--0.075 mm. The use of unsuitable balloons or inappropriate volumes of air within the balloon resulted in applied pressures being under-recorded, both in vitro and in vivo, with consequent overestimation of CL and underestimation of Rp during infant lung function tests. Recommendations are made concerning the techniques of making and using esophageal balloons.
制作了三种不同壁厚、两种不同长度和两种不同直径的食管球囊,以评估哪种类型的球囊在测量动态顺应性(CL)和肺阻力(Rp)时最一致且可靠。对这些球囊进行体外测试,以确定其压力-容积特性和工作范围,然后用于婴儿,比较不同球囊的体内结果。发现最佳球囊的长度为35-50毫米,直径为7.6毫米,壁厚为0.045-0.075毫米。在体外和体内,使用不合适的球囊或球囊内空气量不当都会导致记录的施加压力不足,从而在婴儿肺功能测试中高估CL并低估Rp。针对食管球囊的制作和使用技术提出了建议。