Newacheck P W, Hughes D C, Brindis C, Halfon N
Institute for Health Policy Studies, University of California, San Francisco, USA.
Health Aff (Millwood). 1995 Fall;14(3):232-42. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.14.3.232.
Although results from the evaluation are preliminary thus far, certain tentative conclusions can be reached. First, both care coordination on a small scale and the production of community health report cards are achievable within the relatively short life of a foundation grant. Moreover, both efforts can result in tangible improvements for children and their families. Report cards associated with the initiative have made children's issues more prominent and appear to have led many community leaders to focus greater attention on children's needs. Likewise, many of the care coordination systems developed under the initiative have produced real change for children and their families by guiding them to needed health care and other services. It is important, however, to keep these accomplishments in perspective. While of significant benefit to demonstration communities, the monitoring and care coordination components of this initiative are not unique. A large number of communities have adopted monitoring and reporting programs in recent years. Similarly, care coordination efforts are well established in many communities. What is unique about the RWJF initiative is its attempt at decategorization, and much less progress has been demonstrated for this component. The less-than-hoped-for progress in implementing decategorization at the original sites appears to be the product of a number of interrelated factors. These include an absence of existing models and appropriate technical assistance; political difficulties in gaining cooperation from multiple local agencies involved in service provision; limited progress in establishing needed connections with the state and federal agencies that have authority over categorical programs; and difficulties in implementing major programatic changes when the health care system itself is undergoing rapid change. In combination, these barriers have proven to be largely insurmountable for the originally funded sites, although it is too early in the project to determine which of these factors is predominantly responsible for the lack of success. Whether the newer sites can learn from the experience of the first group and adapt strategies to overcome the multiple hurdles involved remains to be seen. Decategorization is a tool that has the potential to rationalize a fragmented service system by facilitating the coordination of services, especially for children and families with multiple needs. The need for decategorization of funds will not disappear, even if the federal government chooses to combine more of its grant programs to the states into block grants.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
