Rael E G, Stansfeld S A, Shipley M, Head J, Feeney A, Marmot M
Institute for Work and Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
J Epidemiol Community Health. 1995 Oct;49(5):474-81. doi: 10.1136/jech.49.5.474.
To investigate the role of social supports, social networks, and chronic stressors: (i) as predictors of sickness absence; and (ii) as potential explanations for the socioeconomic gradient in sickness absence.
A prospective cohort study (Whitehall II study) with sociodemographic factors, health and social support measured at baseline, and spells of sickness absence measured prospectively.
Twenty London based non-industrial departments of the British civil service.
Participants were civil servants (n = 10,308), aged 35-55 years at baseline, of whom 67% (6895) were men and 33% (3413) were women. The overall response rate for Whitehall II was 73% (74% for men and 71% for women). The analysis is based on 41% of the sample who had data on reasons for sickness absence and were administered all social support questions. Only 4.3% of participants did not complete all necessary questions and were excluded.
High levels of confiding/emotional support from the "closest person" predicted higher levels of both short and long spells of sickness absence. After adjusting for baseline physical and psychological health the effects were increased, suggesting that high levels of confiding/emotional support may encourage illness behaviour rather than generate illness. Social network measures showed a consistent but less striking pattern. Increased levels of negative aspects of social support resulted in higher rates of sickness absence. Material problems strongly predicted sickness absence, but the effect was diminished once adjustment for the covariables was made, suggesting that health status may be functioning as an intervening variable between chronic stressors and sickness absence. In addition, social support may buffer the effects of chronic stressors. Social support did not contribute to explaining the gradient in sickness absence by employment grade beyond that explained by the baseline covariables.
Sickness absence from work is a complex phenomenon, combining illness and coping behaviours. High levels of confiding/emotional support, although not entirely consistent across samples, may either encourage people to stay at home when they are ill or may be accompanied by more social obligations at home prolonging sickness absence. Negative aspects of close relationships may jeopardize health and hence increase sickness absence.
探讨社会支持、社会网络和慢性应激源的作用:(i)作为病假的预测因素;(ii)作为病假社会经济梯度的潜在解释。
一项前瞻性队列研究(白厅II研究),在基线时测量社会人口学因素、健康状况和社会支持,并前瞻性地测量病假时长。
英国公务员位于伦敦的20个非工业部门。
参与者为公务员(n = 10308),基线时年龄在35 - 55岁之间,其中67%(6895)为男性,33%(3413)为女性。白厅II研究的总体应答率为73%(男性为74%,女性为71%)。分析基于样本中41%的数据,这些样本有关于病假原因的数据且回答了所有社会支持问题。只有4.3%的参与者未完成所有必要问题而被排除。
来自“最亲密的人”的高水平倾诉/情感支持预示着短期和长期病假时长都会增加。在对基线身体和心理健康进行调整后,这种影响增强了,这表明高水平的倾诉/情感支持可能会鼓励患病行为而非引发疾病。社会网络测量显示出一种一致但不太显著的模式。社会支持负面方面的增加导致病假率升高。物质问题强烈预示着病假,但在对协变量进行调整后,这种影响减弱了,这表明健康状况可能在慢性应激源和病假之间起到了中介变量的作用。此外,社会支持可能会缓冲慢性应激源的影响。社会支持在解释病假按就业等级的梯度方面,除了基线协变量所解释的部分外,没有额外作用。
因病缺勤是一个复杂的现象,包含疾病和应对行为。高水平的倾诉/情感支持,尽管在不同样本中并不完全一致,可能会鼓励人们生病时待在家里,或者可能伴随着更多家庭社会义务从而延长病假。亲密关系的负面方面可能危及健康,进而增加病假。