Fong T L, Kanel G C, Conrad A, Valinluck B, Charboneau F, Adkins R H
Division of Gastrointestinal and Liver Diseases, University of Southern California, Los Angeles 90033.
Hepatology. 1994 Mar;19(3):554-7. doi: 10.1002/hep.1840190303.
The significance of antibodies to hepatitis C virus in patients with chronic alcoholic liver disease is unclear. Prior studies have utilized the first-generation enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, which is limited by problems with sensitivity and specificity. Hepatitis C virus infection in 137 patients with biopsy-proven alcoholic liver disease was assessed with second-generation hepatitis C virus antibody assays and reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction for detection of hepatitis C virus RNA in the serum. The patients were categorized into three groups according to results of serological testing. Discriminant-function analysis was used to determine which factors (risk, biochemical and histological) could best differentiate the three groups. Thirty-three patients were reactive on second-generation enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay/second-generation recombinant immunoblot assay and RNA positive (group 1). Twelve were reactive on second-generation enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay/second-generation recombinant immunoblot assay but RNA negative (group 2). Eighty-six were nonreactive on second-generation enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, and six were reactive on second-generation enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay but negative on second-generation recombinant immunoblot assay and negative for hepatitis C virus RNA (group 3). Seventy-six percent of patients in group 1 and 58% in group 2 had parenteral risk factors, compared with only 1% in group 3 (p < 0.00001). The mean ALT level was higher in group 1 patients (p < 0.05). The mean histologic activity index was significantly higher in group 1 (p = 0.0007).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)