Ulrik C S
Department of Pulmonary Medicine P, Bispebjerg Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Thorax. 1995 Jul;50(7):750-4. doi: 10.1136/thx.50.7.750.
The acute response to bronchodilators in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is modest; it has, however, been suggested that these patients may benefit from long term treatment.
To investigate the efficacy of salmeterol in smokers with moderate to severe COPD a double blind, randomised, crossover comparison was performed between salmeterol (50 micrograms twice daily) and placebo in 63 patients with stable COPD (mean age 65 years). Prior to inclusion, all patients had a forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) of < 60% of predicted and an improvement in FEV1 of < 15% following 400 micrograms inhaled salbutamol. Patients received four weeks of therapy with each of the treatment regimens. Assessment of efficacy was made with recording of morning and evening peak expiratory flow rates (PEF), respiratory symptoms, and use of rescue salbutamol. FEV1 was measured before and after nebulised salbutamol prior to randomisation and at the end of each treatment period.
Morning PEF values were higher during the salmeterol than during the placebo period, although the mean treatment difference was small (12 l/min (95% confidence limits 6 to 17)). No difference in mean evening PEF values was found. Diurnal variation in PEF, assessed as the difference between the morning PEF and that of the previous evening, was more pronounced during the placebo than during the salmeterol period. The mean spirometric values (including reversibility in FEV1) obtained at the end of the two treatment periods were similar. Compared with placebo, treatment with salmeterol was associated with lower daytime and night time symptom scores and less use of rescue salbutamol both during the day and the night. The patients rated the treatment with salmeterol better than treatment with placebo.
This study shows that, compared with placebo, treatment with salmeterol produces an improvement in respiratory symptoms and morning PEF values in patients with moderate to severe COPD. Treatment with long acting beta agonists may therefore result in an improvement in functional status, even in patients suffering from apparently nonreversible obstructive pulmonary disease.
慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者对支气管扩张剂的急性反应较弱;然而,有人提出这些患者可能从长期治疗中获益。
为研究沙美特罗对中重度COPD吸烟者的疗效,对63例稳定期COPD患者(平均年龄65岁)进行了沙美特罗(50微克,每日两次)与安慰剂的双盲、随机、交叉对照试验。入选前,所有患者一秒用力呼气容积(FEV1)<预测值的60%,吸入400微克沙丁胺醇后FEV1改善<15%。患者接受每种治疗方案为期四周的治疗。通过记录早晚呼气峰值流速(PEF)、呼吸道症状以及急救沙丁胺醇的使用情况来评估疗效。在随机分组前以及每个治疗期结束时,在雾化沙丁胺醇前后测量FEV1。
沙美特罗治疗期间的早晨PEF值高于安慰剂治疗期,尽管平均治疗差异较小(12升/分钟(95%置信区间6至17))。未发现平均夜间PEF值有差异。以早晨PEF与前一晚PEF之差评估的PEF日变化在安慰剂治疗期比沙美特罗治疗期更明显。两个治疗期结束时获得的平均肺功能测定值(包括FEV1的可逆性)相似。与安慰剂相比,沙美特罗治疗使白天和夜间症状评分更低,白天和夜间急救沙丁胺醇的使用也更少。患者对沙美特罗治疗的评价优于安慰剂治疗。
本研究表明,与安慰剂相比,沙美特罗治疗可改善中重度COPD患者的呼吸道症状和早晨PEF值。因此,即使在患有明显不可逆阻塞性肺病的患者中,长效β受体激动剂治疗也可能改善功能状态。