Milander M M, Hiscok P S, Sanders A B, Kern K B, Berg R A, Ewy G A
University Heart Center, University of Arizona Colege of Medicine, Tucson 85724, USA.
Acad Emerg Med. 1995 Aug;2(8):708-13. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.1995.tb03622.x.
To determine: 1) whether chest compressions during CPR are being performed according to American Heart Association (AHA) guidelines during cardiac arrest; and 2) the effect of an audio prompt to guide chest compressions on compliance with AHA guidelines and hemodynamic parameters associated with successful resuscitation.
An observational clinical report and laboratory study was conducted. A research observer responded to a convenience sample of cardiac arrests within a 300-bed hospital and counted the rate of chest compressions and ventilations during CPR. To evaluate the effect of an audio prompt on CPR, health care providers performed chest compression without guidance using a porcine cardiac arrest model for 1 minute, followed by a second minute in which audio guidance was added. Chest compression rates, arterial and venous blood pressures, end-tidal CO2 (ETCO2) levels, and coronary perfusion pressures were measured and compared for the two periods.
Twelve in-hospital cardiac arrests were observed in the clinical part of the study. Only two of 12 patients had chest compressions performed within AHA guidelines. No patient had respirations performed within AHA guidelines. In the laboratory, 41 volunteers were tested, with 66% performing chest compressions outside the AHA standards for compression rate without audible tone guidance. With guided chest compressions, the mean (+/- SD) chest compression rate increased from 74 +/- 22 to 100 +/- 3/min (p < 0.01). End-tidal CO2 levels increased from 15 +/- 7 to 17 +/- 7 torr (p < 0.01). Coronary perfusion pressure increased minimally with audible tone-guided chest compressions.
The majority of Basic Cardiac Life Support--certified health care professionals did not perform CPR according to AHA-recommended guidelines. The use of audible tones to guide chest compression resulted in significantly higher chest compression rates and ETCO2 levels.
确定:1)心脏骤停期间心肺复苏(CPR)时的胸外按压是否按照美国心脏协会(AHA)指南进行;2)音频提示对指导胸外按压以符合AHA指南及与成功复苏相关的血流动力学参数的影响。
进行了一项观察性临床报告和实验室研究。一名研究观察员对一家拥有300张床位医院内方便抽样的心脏骤停病例做出反应,并计算CPR期间的胸外按压频率和通气频率。为评估音频提示对CPR的影响,医护人员使用猪心脏骤停模型在无指导下进行1分钟胸外按压,随后在第2分钟添加音频指导。测量并比较两个时间段的胸外按压频率、动脉和静脉血压、呼气末二氧化碳(ETCO2)水平及冠状动脉灌注压。
在研究的临床部分观察到12例院内心脏骤停病例。12例患者中只有2例的胸外按压是按照AHA指南进行的。没有患者的通气是按照AHA指南进行的。在实验室中,对41名志愿者进行了测试,66%的人在无声音提示指导下进行胸外按压时,按压频率超出了AHA标准。在有指导的胸外按压时,平均(±标准差)胸外按压频率从74±22次/分钟增加到100±3次/分钟(p<0.01)。呼气末二氧化碳水平从15±7托增加到17±7托(p<0.01)。有声音提示指导的胸外按压时冠状动脉灌注压略有增加。
大多数获得基础心脏生命支持认证的医护人员未按照AHA推荐的指南进行CPR。使用声音提示指导胸外按压可显著提高胸外按压频率和ETCO2水平。