Cole R P, Barnet R C, Miller R R
Department of Psychology, State University of New York, Binghamton 13902-6000, USA.
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1995 Oct;21(4):293-303. doi: 10.1037//0097-7403.21.4.293.
This research examined whether the effect of relative stimulus validity (A.R. Wagner, F.A. Logan, K. Haberlandt, & T. Price, 1968) is a deficit of acquisition or performance. Experiment 1 demonstrated the relative validity effect using rats in a conditioned lick suppression. task. A target cue trained in the presence of another cue that was a more valid predictor of reinforcement exhibited less behavioral control than a target cue that had been trained in the presence of an equally valid predictor of reinforcement. In Experiment 2, the more valid predictor was extinguished after training. This manipulation increased responding to the target cue, thereby attenuating the effect of low relative validity. This outcome suggests that the relative validity effect is a performance deficit. In addition, recovery from the relative validity deficit was specific to the particular target stimulus that was trained in the presence of the subsequently extinguished cue.
本研究考察了相对刺激有效性效应(A.R. 瓦格纳、F.A. 洛根、K. 哈伯兰特和T. 普赖斯,1968年)是习得缺陷还是表现缺陷。实验1在条件性舔舐抑制任务中使用大鼠证明了相对有效性效应。在存在另一个对强化更有效的预测线索的情况下训练的目标线索,与在存在同样有效的强化预测线索的情况下训练的目标线索相比,表现出的行为控制更少。在实验2中,更有效的预测线索在训练后被消退。这种操作增加了对目标线索的反应,从而减弱了低相对有效性的影响。这一结果表明相对有效性效应是一种表现缺陷。此外,从相对有效性缺陷中的恢复特定于在随后被消退的线索存在的情况下训练的特定目标刺激。