Bongard F, Lee T S, Leighton T, Liu S Y
Department of Surgery, Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, USA.
J Clin Monit. 1995 Sep;11(5):329-34. doi: 10.1007/BF01616992.
Venous oximetry catheters provide useful realtime information about mixed venous hemoglobin saturation (Svo2). Currently available systems utilize either two or three wavelengths of light to obtain these measurements. Previous animal and clinical studies have attempted to compare the accuracy of these two devices under similar circumstances. However, the relative accuracy of the two-wavelength versus three-wavelength systems has never been assessed under identical conditions. For this purpose, we designed an animal model for simultaneous measurement of Svo2, over a wide range of physiologic and pathologic states.
Seven anesthetized swine underwent simultaneous placement of two- and three-wavelength catheters. Paired data points consisted of values obtained from a reference oximeter and from each of the catheters. Observations were obtained every 15 min during the following manipulations: (1) eucarbic hypoxia induced by reducing FiO2 to 0.18, 0.15, and 0.12 for 15 min each; (2) stimulated surgical manipulation; and (3) hypovolemic shock produced by hemorrhage to a mean arterial pressure of 50 torr for 1 hr. Data were analyzed by calculation of mean error (bias) and precision for each system in comparison with the oximeter.
The overall error of the two-wavelength system was +0.15%, with a precision of +/- 2.52%. The three-wavelength system had an overall error of +3.71%, with a precision of +/- 2.30%. Overall correlation between catheter Svo2 and oximeter values was the same for both devices (r = 0.99).
Both currently available in vivo spectrophotometric systems are capable of producing satisfactory results over wide ranges of Svo2. In contradistinction to older reports, we found that the two-wavelength Svo2 system produced results equivalent to those obtained from the three-wavelength device. In this regard, there is no detectable advantage in accuracy to measuring in vivo Svo2 with three rather than with two wavelengths.
静脉血氧饱和度导管可提供有关混合静脉血红蛋白饱和度(Svo2)的有用实时信息。目前可用的系统利用两个或三个波长的光来进行这些测量。先前的动物和临床研究试图在相似情况下比较这两种设备的准确性。然而,两波长系统与三波长系统的相对准确性从未在相同条件下进行评估。为此,我们设计了一种动物模型,用于在广泛的生理和病理状态下同时测量Svo2。
七只麻醉猪同时植入两波长和三波长导管。配对数据点包括从参考血氧计和每个导管获得的值。在以下操作过程中每15分钟进行一次观察:(1)通过将FiO2分别降至0.18、0.15和0.12持续15分钟来诱导等碳酸血症性缺氧;(2)模拟手术操作;(3)通过出血使平均动脉压降至50托持续1小时来产生低血容量性休克。通过计算每个系统与血氧计相比的平均误差(偏差)和精密度来分析数据。
两波长系统的总体误差为+0.15%,精密度为±2.52%。三波长系统的总体误差为+3.71%,精密度为±2.30%。两种设备的导管Svo2与血氧计值之间的总体相关性相同(r = 0.99)。
目前可用的两种体内分光光度系统在广泛的Svo2范围内都能产生令人满意的结果。与早期报告不同,我们发现两波长Svo2系统产生的结果与三波长设备相当。在这方面,用三个波长而非两个波长测量体内Svo2在准确性上没有可检测到的优势。