Curran T, Hintzman D L
Department of Psychology, University of Oregon, USA.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1995 May;21(3):531-47. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.21.3.531.
L. L. Jacoby, J. P. Toth, and A. P. Yonelinas (1993) advocated a process-dissociation procedure for estimating the contributions to task performance of consciously controlled (R) versus automatic (A) memory processes. The procedure relies on the strong assumption that memory-guided performance attributable to R is stochastically independent of that attributable to A. Violations of this independence assumption can produce artifactual dissociations between estimates of R and A. Such artifactual dissociations were obtained in a series of word-stem completion experiments: R increased with presentation duration, whereas A, paradoxically, decreased. Direct evidence for nonindependence was obtained from correlations between R and A in each of the experiments. These results suggest that the independence assumption was violated, and other applications of process dissociation should not be taken at face value without a thorough evaluation of independence.
L. L. 雅各比、J. P. 托特和A. P. 约内利纳斯(1993年)提倡一种过程分离程序,用于估计有意识控制(R)与自动(A)记忆过程对任务表现的贡献。该程序依赖于一个强有力的假设,即归因于R的记忆引导表现与归因于A的表现随机独立。违反这种独立性假设会在R和A的估计之间产生人为的分离。在一系列词干补全实验中获得了这种人为的分离:R随着呈现时间的延长而增加,而A却反常地减少。通过每个实验中R和A之间的相关性获得了非独立性的直接证据。这些结果表明独立性假设被违反了,并且在没有对独立性进行全面评估的情况下,过程分离的其他应用不应被表面看待。